Search for: "Peoples v. United States" Results 3661 - 3680 of 20,864
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2023, 8:00 am by Erin Sutton
Department of Justice (“DOJ”) opined that the United States Postal Service (“USPS”) could still mail medications used for abortion because DOJ interpreted the Comstock Act to apply to “unlawful use. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
The agreement “stated that it was governed by Belize law.” In 2008, the United Democratic Party took power on a good government platform, and the new prime minister, Dean Barrow, asserted that the contract was invalid and repudiated it. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 7:12 am by Chase Strangio
As part of a coordinated national effort to erode legal protections for trans people and push us out of public life, a wave of bills targeting gender-affirming health care for transgender people have effectively banned it for nearly one-third of transgender youth in the United States. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 9:15 am by Josh Blackman
Because this issue will be resolved entirely on the basis of state law, an appeal to the United States Supreme Court will not be possible. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 5:50 pm by Amy Howe
Two years ago, the Supreme Court issued its decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 1:28 pm by Steven Cohen
Caterpillar – United States District Court – Eastern District of Texas – November 7th, 2018) involves a products liability claim. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 6:14 am by Leland E. Beck
– Deputy Solicitor General Malcolm Stewart, before the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 9:17 am
Read his powerful statement here.Environmental racism in the United States had already caught the attention of the UN. [read post]
3 May 2019, 7:16 am by Florian Mueller
Yesterday evening the United States Department of Justice filed a statement in Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 1:34 pm by Benton Martin, E.D. Mich.
In particular, the prosecutor made the following argument in his sentencing memorandum:Many citizens of the United States have grown impatient with their government’s seeming inability to deter undocumented immigrants, convicted of felonies in the United States and deported back to their home countries, from returning to the United States illegally. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 4:43 pm by Eugene Volokh
And that is precisely what the Supreme Court held in Richardson v. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 11:12 am by Florian Mueller
It's possible that many of the lawmakers who voted against the proposal simply didn't want their state, with not even a million inhabitants, to take such a fundamental decision against two of the country's largest and most powerful companies.There definitely is broadbased political support for the fight against app store monopolies: last fall, the Democratic majority of the United States House of Representatives adopted a report on digital markets that… [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 7:15 am by Jeanne Long
  Three of those involved a question arising under Padilla v Kentucky, the 2010 United States Supreme Court case holding that it can be ineffective assistance of counsel for a criminal defense attorney to fail to advise his noncitizen client of the immigration consequences of pending criminal charges. [read post]