Search for: "State v. Harding"
Results 3661 - 3680
of 16,054
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2017, 1:14 pm
As these cases show, the states’ applications of the death penalty have exposed individuals to execution who should have been protected because of their intellectual disability (Moore v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 1:40 pm
The 7th Circuit in Brownmark Films v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:09 am
Lord Toulson noted the frequently quoted words of Lord Hoffmann in R v Secretary of State for the Home Office, Ex p Simms [2000] 2 AC 115 that “Fundamental rights cannot be overridden by general or ambiguous words” and said importantly that “while Lord Hoffmann said that this presumption will apply “even” to the most general words, but I would say further that the more general the words, the harder it is likely to be to rebut the… [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 7:08 am
I find it hard to believe that any lawyer blessed that statutory interpretation. [read post]
22 Mar 2006, 5:21 am
In United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 7:58 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Association des Éleveurs de Canards et d’Oies du Québec, et al., v. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 8:36 am
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/823979.no1.pdf State v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 4:30 pm
Yeager v. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 8:20 am
The law in this regard was summarised by Arnold J in Jarden Consumer Solutions (Europe) Ltd v SEB SA [2014] EWHC 445 (Pat) at [103]: “[103] As Kitchin LJ and Sir Robin Jacob said in their joint judgment in Gedeon Richter plc v Bayer Pharma AG[2012] EWCA Civ 235, [2013] Bus LR D17 at [61], ‘it is trite law that… the older (from the priority date of a patent under attack) a piece of prior art said to render a patent obvious, the harder it is to show… [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 6:09 pm
Innovator v Innovator - does this matter where injunctions are concerned? [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am
Indeed, Griffin’s Case was about a state office, and the Court in Trump v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 1:28 pm
Six long years had passed since the Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 7:42 am
Tony Allen, the state’s “expert,” agreed that it’s hard to authenticate parents online, another time his testimony hurt the state’s case. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 10:42 pm
Mid-State Bank and Trust Co., 560 A.2d 151, 153-53 (Pa. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 8:30 am
("CA Appeals Court: Claims Under State Spam Statute Not Preempted by CAN-SPAM - Hypertouch v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 12:01 am
In R&J Holding Co. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 1:52 pm
Election Comm’n v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 12:40 pm
It's hard to win a consumer class action these days. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 8:36 am
The Commonwealth Court addressed this issue in the case of Penn State University v. [read post]
