Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend" Results 3661 - 3680 of 6,888
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2012, 2:39 am by SHG
  We have rules of evidence to assure that defendants aren't convicted upon unreliable evidence. [read post]
3 Mar 2007, 5:37 am
From The Arizona Republic:County agencies have until Wednesday to come up with a plan to provide lawyers for defendants who face the death penalty, a judge ruled Friday.The county must furnish lead attorneys for inmates who don't have one, provide lawyers for capital cases in the pipeline and craft a plan to avoid a future crisis, ruled Presiding Criminal Judge James Keppel of Maricopa County Superior Court.The ruling brought prosecutors and… [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 4:22 pm
Maybe we’re less stressed because we dont have law licenses to lose, and are almost never named defendants in legal malpractice suits. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 4:46 pm by Rick
Public defenders dont have to worry about such things. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 10:25 am by Eric
We dont see enough of the things Section 230 protects. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 4:17 am by SHG
  And for the rest of us, those of us who aren't being asked to take one for the team, we don't seem sufficiently bothered by these flaws in our system to lose much sleep either. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 11:35 am by Ryan Mulvey
And dont get me started on the proposed exemption for “[a]ny information not in the possession of the courts. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 4:19 am by SHG
Cases where the judges actually think there is some chance the defendant isn't guilty, guilty, guilty? [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 5:49 am
DPS takes an administration fee, and the rest goes to the state's trauma care fund.Here's the rub: Most people don't pay, so we actually have MORE people driving around with suspended licenses in Texas. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 4:37 am by SHG
"If they don't win, they don't win. [read post]
10 Dec 2024, 6:10 pm by David Oscar Markus
  It's time that some of our district judges grant motions to dismiss and appellate judges reverse cases with no harm, instead of letting the Supremes do it over and over again. [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 10:24 pm
  But, taken all in all, I don't actually perceive the Constitution imperilled by them. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 8:16 am
First of all, it gives us Public Defenders a bad rap - people assume that the reason we can't get them the same results as the Paris Hiltons in the world is because they don't have the money to hire a high priced group of lawyers like she can, and they're stuck with worthless lawyers like us. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 11:37 am by Eric
As both Judge Kozinski and Judge McKeown acknowledge, the point of the 47 USC 230 immunity is to help defendants save those costs for the defense. [read post]