Search for: "Cooper v. United States"
Results 3681 - 3700
of 4,614
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2014, 8:51 am
It’s Auntie BBC v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 8:16 pm
Ex parte Cooper involved a method of transferring funds. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 12:02 pm
Probable Cause for a Glove Box Search State v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 2:21 pm
More on Clapper v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 6:06 am
United States, 498 U.S. 192 (1991), which recognized that a sincerely held belief that taxes were not legally owed was a defense that should be submitted to a jury. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 8:31 am
Aftermath of Brane v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 9:49 am
Rhode Island is one of nearly half of the United States that does not permit a Chapter 9 filing. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 2:31 pm
It has been consistently recognized by the courts of this State that there is an overriding need of a custodial parent and children to occupy and remain in the marital residence, which needs outweighs the non-custodial Page 26 parent's desire to receive any immediate proceeds from its sale (see Nissen v. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 4:06 pm
The Mishcon blog has a post “Regulatory Cooperation and Information sharing” concerning a former director banned by the insolvency service after an ICO penalty in relation to the sending of unsolicited SMS messages. [read post]
12 May 2022, 10:55 am
In Apex Oil Co. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
: Whirlpool Corporation v Kenwood Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (IPKat) EWHC (QB): When lawfully seized items can’t be retained under s 22 Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (1709 Copyright Blog) United States US General Obama IP vacancies (IP Frontline) Kappos confirmation hearing set for 29 July (IP Watchdog) (IAM) (Peter… [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 2:55 pm
This chapter shall be liberally construed to effectuate its purposes; provided that this chapter shall not be construed as conferring any power or permitting any action which is inconsistent with the Constitution and laws of the United States, but, in so construing this chapter, due consideration shall be given to the circumstances as they exist from time to time. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 2:55 pm
This chapter shall be liberally construed to effectuate its purposes; provided that this chapter shall not be construed as conferring any power or permitting any action which is inconsistent with the Constitution and laws of the United States, but, in so construing this chapter, due consideration shall be given to the circumstances as they exist from time to time. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 12:48 pm
United States. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 4:59 am
As a result, on April 24, 2023, in a telephone call between Sebco and United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), the latter indicted that [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
(Promote the Progress) N D Illinois one step closer to adopting patent rules (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Innovate Texas Foundation launched to accelerate state’s IP commercialisation (Technology Transfer Tactics) Special Masters a [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 7:04 am
“It's hard to know how this is going to play out until we see more units permitted and different types of units and how the guidance gets applied or not applied by state authorities and EPA to an individual set of circumstances,” said Steve Kohl, a partner at Warner, Norcross & Judd LLP who represented the Wolverine Power Supply Cooperative for two permit applications in Michigan.However, reducing emissions through efficiency has been the main… [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 3:46 pm
§ 793, prohibits “willfully retain[ing]” information “relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation” and “fails to deliver it on demand to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it” (emphasis added). [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 8:19 pm
” Premo v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 12:01 am
In fact, the first Supreme Court Justice, James Wilson, wrote in Chisholm v. [read post]