Search for: "Doe v. State"
Results 3681 - 3700
of 93,833
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2024, 8:55 pm
In Lindke v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 9:00 pm
In Walton v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 7:22 pm
The petition of the day is: Steager v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:50 pm
H.C.R. 24 also does not purport to limit a convention’s agenda; indeed, it contemplates multiple amendments. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 6:21 pm
As New York Civil Law wrote in a prior post, the New York Court of Appeals heard oral arguments earlier this month in Raffellini v. [read post]
25 May 2009, 11:25 am
Varieties protected by Plant Variety Protection (PVP) Title V can be sold only as a class of certified seed as will be designated by the individual states. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 3:00 pm
BOSTOCK v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 12:00 am
BOSTOCK v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 4:29 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 11:45 am
For the Oregon hypothetical, the solicitor general explains that states never have immunity in the courts of the other states, pointing to the Supreme Court’s 1979 decision in Nevada v. [read post]
21 Aug 2016, 3:44 am
Judge Sean Cox’s decision in EEOC v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 2:56 pm
Bennett v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 9:57 am
” The Court wrote, quoting the State Supreme Court’s 1980 decision in Bishop v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 5:16 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 4:41 am
It stated that the option to postpone is only possible where that Member State has made an application for postponement as soon as it is objectively apparent that conformity with the limits cannot be achieved in a given zone of agglomeration by the specified deadline; the directive does not contain any exception to that obligation. [read post]
11 May 2011, 8:50 am
See also Graham v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 5:05 am
That trade secret protection, as weak or as strong as one views it, is an alternative form of protection for an invention was emphatically recognized by the United States Supreme Court in the 1974 case of Kewanee Oil Co. v Bicron Oil. [read post]
21 May 2020, 7:38 am
In Ramos v. [read post]
11 Jul 2009, 4:13 pm
Doe v. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 10:20 am
The Supreme Court held that FISA does not displace the state secrets doctrine, but did not resolve the parties disagreement about the interpretation of the relevant portion of FISA, nor did it decide whether the district court was correct in dismissing the suit on the pleadings. [read post]
