Search for: "In re E.G."
Results 3681 - 3700
of 13,662
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2008, 10:12 am
We're skeptical. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 6:29 am
The case has elicited such public interest — see, e.g., the nifty media guide [PDF] issued by the court — that the judge in the matter has ruled that it be broadcast on YouTube. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 1:04 pm
At the city level, though, Mayor Bloomberg apparently warned that "[e]ven if you think that it's fair to take [the bonuses] away, just recognize that we're going to have to make up that tax gap, that reduction, by taxing the rest of us. [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 1:35 pm
Start with the low-hanging fruit of re-designating Social Security taxes as partly loans, and Social Security benefits as thus partly repayments of loan principal. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 9:41 am
And perhaps most troubling of all - and this is a critique of the law as much as the course - we're still studying retail investor rules in an institutional investor world. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 9:00 am
While you might think you're stuck with Justice Potter Stewart's classic definition of obscenity ("I know it when I see it") when the examining attorneys make their decisions, a series of USPTO determinations has recently been collected that give you a more solid understanding of just what kinds of marks have been considered immoral, deceptive, or scandalous.Trademarks Laid Bare: Marks that May be Scandalous or Immoral (available in the Gallagher Law Library here) gives… [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 8:00 pm
E.g., this. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 2:14 pm
.* Performance/top med centers: Problematic re quality of care and follow-up.* Over-treatment (meds, tests, procedures): Pandemic.* Use of hard evidence in medical decision-making: Spotty at best.* Collection of evidence based on reported treatment errors: Low.* Use of S.O.P.s in treatment regimes: Spotty.* Incentives for appropriate care: Low.* Incentives for inappropriate care: High.* Emphasis on prevention and wellness: Low.* Emphasis on chronic-care: Low.* State-of-the-art IS/IT: Rare.*… [read post]
1 Sep 2006, 7:45 am
The mediator asks questions and discovers information which is below the surface level of the stated disputes (e.g., why is this issue so important to the particular party?) [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 6:42 pm
Second, with so much focus on whether or not there are abusive lawsuits (see, e.g., the farcical DOC report on trademark bullying), it seems useful to catalog some of the bad dispositions we're seeing without the dispute getting into court so that policy-makers can understand the true scope of the issues. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 2:31 am
(Indeed, Crowley penned a plan for HistoryLink's future, Seattle Times, Sept. 23, 2007.)Among the thousands of articles on our state's history that are on HistoryLink, there are many on our legal history, e.g. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
Nevertheless, if you're using a caregiver now (or will in the future), don't overlook this potentially valuable deduction. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 7:03 pm
Many of you seemed to enjoy the horror stories -- and they're informative, too, providing lessons about behavior to avoid. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 6:48 am
Several EU countries (e.g. [read post]
31 May 2007, 7:53 am
E.g., Blakely v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 8:30 am
See, e.g., Security Professionals, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 9:59 pm
You can discount them, too, without worrying you're missing anything. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 3:30 am
Here’s how it started: And here’s how it all ended: You mentioned an HR lesson…we’re waiting. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 8:48 am
Yesterday at a news conference in Iowa, he downplayed the controversies — e.g., the U.S. [read post]
18 Sep 2012, 9:23 am
And, if you’re sensibilities can handle it, you can also hear me & the Recruiting Animal sing butcher Chicago’s “If You Leave Me Now” (at the beginning of the show). [read post]
