Search for: "People v. Mays"
Results 3681 - 3700
of 39,685
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
Background on the King v. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 4:32 am
The judgment is also a cautionary tale for solicitors to ensure the accuracy of its client’s witness statements and their duties to the Court when evidence emerges which may be contrary to earlier findings of fact by the Court. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 1:03 pm
A recent case, Bragg v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 9:29 am
Case Citation: Brooks v. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 2:15 pm
Last week the Seventh Circuit held exactly the opposite in National Rifle Association v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 12:51 am
It, therefore, went ahead to determine MCSN’s counterclaim and entered judgment in MCSN’s favour.On the issue of the status of MCSN as a mere exclusive assignee of copyright, the court placed particular reliance on the case of PMRS v Skye Bank.In the PMRS v Skye Bank case, the Court of Appeal reviewed its previous decisions on the question of MCSN’s standing to sue for copyright infringement when it is not an approved collecting society. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 4:48 am
Some people are cheering and some people are shrugging in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision last week in Star Athletica v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:00 am
You can’t have such incompetent people driving taxis, people who know so little about the city, and think that they took actual exams. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 2:24 pm
(Informed readers may well understand my reference.) [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 12:31 pm
Some people -- myself included -- may like the ability to slam (and be slammed) head on. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 11:31 pm
If nothing else, the Indian Supreme Court may, in considering Cole v Whitfield (and its emphasis upon historical context), judge that the Australian provision is the product of unique Australian conditions and that precedents emerging from that context should be weighed in light of the very different political and historical exigencies prevailing in India. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 1:50 am
And while the military may make mistakes in releasing people who are dangerous, I would imagine judges will make more. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 3:04 am
The People". [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 6:49 pm
Lindh v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 12:00 am
CA - PEOPLE v. [read post]
22 Dec 2019, 4:12 pm
The Court then examined the impugned remarks ‘characterised by the domestic courts as incitement to religious hatred’, and noted that some of the remarks ‘may’ be seen by ‘certain religious people’ as an ‘abusive attack on the Prophet of Islam and Muslims living in Europe, capable of causing religious hatred’. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 9:00 pm
Shuttlesworth v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 1:04 pm
The proof here purports to be circumstantial: the odometer reading was 004 on May 8, 1974, 003 on June 13, 1974, 001 on August 18, 1974, and 001 on September 30, 1974. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 2:07 pm
And understand that people may well use it against you as well.Super important. [read post]
