Search for: "People v. Saling"
Results 3681 - 3700
of 5,569
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2016, 8:46 am
(Unocal Corp. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 9:16 am
Wilson v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 12:23 pm
This weblog has been existence for getting on for 12 years and many people erroneously assume that it was the first intellectual property weblog. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 8:41 am
Where, as here, a company’s public-facing statements are legitimately confusing, it is not the public’s fault for being confused. * Boston Globe: Boston Globe launches ‘Fresh Start’ initiative: People can apply to have past coverage about them reviewed * Owens v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 11:02 am
Black v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 5:53 am
In 2017, a gunman opened fire on a music festival in Las Vegas using semi-automatic rifles equipped with “bump-stock” devices, killing 60 people and wounding 500 more. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 5:41 am
Fourth, the paintings could be forfeited because there was “probable cause to believe that they were brought to the United States contrary to law, the possessors of the Defendant Paintings [were] aware that they were stolen and are attempting to offer the Defendant Paintings for sale . . . . [read post]
25 Aug 2019, 11:12 am
In her FTC v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 9:42 am
" Jones v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 12:44 pm
Connecticut (striking down a ban on condom sales, even to married people). [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 5:41 am
Rid your mind of any concept of the Constitution as a democratic document, expressing the political will of the people, as expressed in Marbury v. [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 11:48 pm
Of course, a favorable result would exponentially increase the sales of the drug in question because it means that the entire adult population of the world would believe that Crestor is a miraculous life-extending drug. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 9:58 am
In the case of Media CAT Ltd v Adams & Ors [2011] EWPCC 10, Media CAT accused several people of infringing pornographic material. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am
On 1 and 2 November 2023, the UK Supreme court (Lords Reed, Sales, Hamblen, Burrows and Richards) heard the appeal in the case of Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:07 am
The case is a follow-on to the similarly famous Masterpiece Cakeshop, involving a state’s ability to compel people with religious objections to same-sex marriage to use their artistic talents for such ceremonies. [read post]
15 Jul 2023, 7:37 am
” People v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:13 am
Purely Creative/Office of Fair Trading about aggressive sales practices. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 1:37 pm
ESA v. [read post]
22 Oct 2016, 3:26 am
” Thus, for example, a publican who, without a licence, shows a broadcast of a football game to its customers doubtless does so with intent to gain (attracting customers, increasing sales). [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 4:12 pm
The end result of the legislative process thus would be a Public Law effectively branding this theory of liability as, in the parlance of Inclusive Communities, a disparate impact claim that is “abusive” of sales finance companies and banks engaged in the automobile sales finance business. [read post]
