Search for: "People v. Sell" Results 3681 - 3700 of 5,340
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
This leap in the tailoring requirement is often ignored, because people are taken in by the statute’s title and the fact it invokes a “return” to Sherbert v. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 12:14 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  These particular people could have outsized influence. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 4:18 am by INFORRM
Pierre-Louis cited to the late Justice Antonin Scalia’s majority opinion in Brown v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 12:21 pm by John Jascob
The SEC found that the adviser’s late-afternoon trades were intended to mark the close in order to reflect higher portfolio balances in clients’ monthly account statements (Koch v. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 11:44 pm by Jeff Gamso
 Justice Roberts, with whom I rarely find myself in agreement (and would he stop with that smirky smile, already), got this much exactly right in U.S. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 12:03 pm by Alex Moss
They can only be used to stop people from doing those things in their country of issuance. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
Rather, as I shall explain, it is the people on the other side of this argument who want to invoke the Fourteenth Amendment.In very condensed form, the Buchanan/Dorf position goes like this: Article I of the Constitution gives Congress the powers to spend, tax, and borrow. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 4:51 am by Ben
v=9eN0CIyF2ok And finally, remember Re-Digi? [read post]
4 Jan 2015, 2:47 am
The world’s best-selling drug in 2013 was a ‘biologic’, an antibody protein called Humira. [read post]
24 Dec 2017, 4:08 pm by Larry
The fact that it is Christmas makes a discussion, however brief, of Rubies Costume Co. v. [read post]
20 May 2020, 3:03 pm by Joe Mullin
Their lawsuits and threats are attempts at rent-seeking; they’re demanding money from people who make, use, or sell technology just for doing what they were already doing—for crossing the proverbial “bridge” that the patent troll has decided to lurk under. [read post]