Search for: "C. v. C." Results 3701 - 3720 of 56,519
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2016, 1:18 pm
 Following Coflexip SA v Stolt Comex Seaway MS Ltd [2001] 1 All ER 952, Carr J held that the Court has discretion to impose an injunction where it is necessary and appropriate in the circumstances. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 9:08 pm by Michael Geist
  It is this test - which is not even part of Bill C-32 - that the writers groups likely want to target. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 2:22 am
Municipality may sue active and passive “tortfeasors” to recover wages and medical benefits paid injured police officers and firefightersTown of Amherst v Mead, et al, 57 AD3d 1438The Town of Amherst sued commenced Brian Burns Mead and other defendants seeking reimbursement for the wages and medical bills of a police officer employed by the Town pursuant to pursuant to General Municipal Law§207-c(6).The police officer was injured when the police vehicle he was… [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 8:35 am by José Guillermo
Lo que resulta REDUNDANTE E INAPROPIADO es el término feminicidio en todo caso se debió ampliar el concepto tal cual mi sugerencia en  mi comentario al artículo 107º, "si la víctima ha sido el cónyuge o conviviente de la autora el delito se denominará "varonicidio". [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 4:12 am
On 12 February 2009 the Court of Appeal handed down its judgment in Greene Wood & Mclean LLP v Templeton Insurance Ltd. [read post]