Search for: "Call v. State"
Results 3701 - 3720
of 55,484
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2023, 8:56 am
From today's unanimous Georgia Supreme Court decision in Knox v. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 12:05 pm
On Aug. 26, the Israeli Supreme Court, in the case of Tziam v. the Prime Minister, ordered the state to grant the petitioners, five Palestinian women living in Gaza who required life-saving medical treatment, permission to enter East Jerusalem for the purpose of receiving healthcare. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 7:51 am
Call Toll Free 877-446-5294. [read post]
30 May 2007, 12:34 pm
Platinum Networks in United States District Court in San Diego. $47.4M / $6K is a 7900 to 1 ratio, which seems to be just a bit beyond the due process parameters of State Farm Insurance v. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm
In the 2013 case of Shelby County v. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 10:19 am
The State allows officers to demand a driver give blood if they refused to take a breathalyzer test. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 7:05 am
Boldin suggests that states could rely upon a longstanding legal principle called the anticommandeering doctrine" to potentially thwart mass surveillance of Americans by the NSA. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 11:57 am
In Gallon v. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 11:10 am
But the Supreme Court recently, in Munaf v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 7:48 am
Turning to the second question Binnie J reviewed what was then the leading Canadian case on fundamental breach: Hunter Engineering Co. v Syncrude Canada Ltd. [1989] 1 SCR 426. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 12:34 pm
People v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 5:01 am
And, based on the CCA opinion in Griffith v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 4:05 pm
But there is a state Constitutional provision (sometimes called the anti-moonlighting provision) that apparently prevents judges from taking a state job during their terms of office -- even if the judge has left that office! [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
The complaint (full text) in Buck v. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 11:15 am
Smith v. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 1:11 pm
State v. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
Sandoval, by Gerald TorresThe Distorted History That Gave Rise to the "So Called" Plenary Power Doctrine : The Story of United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 10:40 am
Apple v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 6:09 am
In a decision released on January 11, 2012, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled unanimously that a “called” teacher is a “minister” covered by the ministerial exception, grounded in Religion Clauses of the First Amendment, and that the ministerial exception operated as an affirmative defense, not a jurisdictional bar, to employment discrimination claims against a religious employer.The case, Hosanna–Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School… [read post]
3 May 2022, 9:01 pm
United States as conferring constitutional status on the warnings and the associated exclusionary rule. [read post]
