Search for: "Chambers v. State" Results 3701 - 3720 of 4,896
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
Freedom of Information The Panopticon Blog has a post on last’s weeks decision of the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights in Magyar Helsinki Bizottság v Hungary, in relation to the Article 10 right to freedom of information. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 12:02 am by Melina Padron
European stem cells Last week the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union issued a judgment in the case of Oliver Brüstle v Greenpeace e.V (Case C? [read post]
21 Feb 2021, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
On 16 February 2021 Tipples J handed down judgment in the libel and data protection case of Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] EWHC 269 (QB). [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am by INFORRM
United States The Harvard Cyberlaw Clinic has filed an amicus brief in the case of Hermès International v Rothschild in the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit representing individual creatives and arts and cultural organisations. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:53 am
It was also settled before the case could be heard by a jury at the state level. [read post]
27 May 2012, 8:23 am by Charon QC
Jaguar Shoes v Jaguar Cars: Blame It On The Lawyers! [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 7:54 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
  The trial court stated that it would not force a 17-year to participate in parenting time when she stated that she did not want to see her Father. [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 7:36 pm by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
  The trial court stated that it would not force a 17-year to participate in parenting time when she stated that she did not want to see her Father. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 1:25 am by Eleonora Rosati
This means that Member States might (though they are not obliged to) “address that dynamic concern by granting rightholders ‘rights to receive fuller information’. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 2:49 pm
Today, the Second Chamber of the General Court handed over two interesting judgments (cases T-426/11 and T-412/11, Maharishi Foundation Ltd. v OHIM), which provide useful guidance on the evaluation of the descriptive character of a sign, as well as on the notion of relevant public, in relation to a word sign whose meaning can be easily understood by consumers residing in different member states, due to its closeness to equivalent expressions in other national languages. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 3:20 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> AmerGen Energy Company, LLC v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:23 pm
Georgia judgment and the Ilascu and others v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 3:17 am by INFORRM
  The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Justice, Mr Jonathan Djanogly, replied for the Government. [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
Statements in Open Court and Apologies On 17 January 2018 there was unilateral statement in court before Sir David Eady in the case of Chambers v DCR. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 6:44 am by INFORRM
 Doughty Street Chambers also covered the case in their blog. [read post]