Search for: "State Bar Association v. State" Results 3701 - 3720 of 9,065
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2019, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday a unanimous court ruled in Thacker v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 8:54 am by Rory Little
Indeed, the American Bar Association has expressed a strong view, in its Standards for Prosecution and Defense lawyers, that some appeal waivers should be impermissible. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 1:38 am by Christa Culver
DuncanDocket: 10-489Issue(s): Whether the doctrine of prudential ripeness can bar a state from obtaining a timely judicial determination of its obligations under Spending Clause legislation.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (2d Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in opposition of respondent Arne DuncanPetitioners' reply Title: Utah v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 8:10 am
Van Hook, which reversed the lower court’s relief granted to a capital defendant because it relied on the guidelines of the American Bar Association to decide the definition of adequate counsel, as “curious. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:59 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Citizens for Environmental Responsibility v State ex rel. 14th Dist. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 8:48 am
(The plaintiffs' bar is skilled at giving the same old thing a different name, as evidenced by their recent name change from the "American Trial Lawyers Association" to the euphemistic "American Association for Justice" - while it is easy to be against trial lawyers, who can be against "justice"?) [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 4:53 pm by John Elwood
   United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 9:47 am by Kevin M. Mazza, Esq.
Despite opposition by the New Jersey State Bar Association, this bill has already been approved by the State Senate Judiciary Committee, and will likely be approved by the full Legislature in due course. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 3:05 am by Walter Olson
They were picked because they were articulate and looked like judges but weren’t state bar members; for bar members, being on the show was seen as unlawful advertising. [read post]