Search for: "U. S. Appeal of"
Results 3701 - 3720
of 6,193
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
’"* Clearly there was no dispute that Whalen’s admission to stealing more than $50,000 from the City over the course of a nearly six-year period constitutes conclusive proof of such facts and established the City's entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the issue of Whalen's liability. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 5:30 am
I don't think that's a plausible reading, however -- and it's not one that any other member of the Alabama Court endorses. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 5:00 am
For background on Sandifer, see my coverage of last October’s oral argument. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 5:14 pm
The notices of deficiency provided: "[U]nder IRC Section 2511[,] donor's merger of Knight Tool Co. into Camelot Systems, Inc. in return for 19% of the stock of Camelot Systems, Inc. resulted in a gift of $23,085,000.00 to the other shareholders of Camelot Systems, Inc. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 10:13 am
U. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:31 am
In Gunn, in pointing out that it was not creating embedded-issue doctrine on a blank canvas, he said "[u]nfortunately, the canvas looks like one that Jackson Pollock got to first." [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 1:40 pm
On 19 July 2023, INTERAPOTHEK filed an appeal against the Opposition Division's decision.AnalysisThe First Division of the Board of Appeal divided its reasoning into several stages. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 8:42 am
Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 6:36 am
Adams, 449 U. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 10:40 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed the district court’s judgment and held that the district court had not clearly abused its discretion in refusing to transfer the case. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 8:08 am
Although the U. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:13 am
This Part II examines in some detail Trustmark’s background and rationale, and Part III will focus on Trustmark’s implications on the Scandinavian Re and Dealer Computer appeals. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 1:16 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITTortsDenial of Libel Claim Is Upheld Due to Absolute Privilege of Employers' NASD Form U-5 Statements Rosenberg v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 2:19 pm
There is little doubt in this Kat’s mind that this particular decision will not hold upon further appeal to the Bundesgerichtshof. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 12:51 pm
On appeal, the Higher Regional Court of Frankfurt, found - partly - in favour of the claimant (case references: OLG Frankfurt am Main, 11 U 22/08 and 11 U 21/08 of 23 December 2008).Upon further appeal, the VI Civil Senate of the Bundesgerichtshof, which is, inter alia, responsible for personality right cases, has now dismissed the claims. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 5:42 am
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 1:31 pm
The Court of Appeals begins its opinion by explaining that “R.D., a juvenile appeals the district court’s adjudication of delinquency. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 11:05 am
U will B executed Saturday. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 1:41 pm
Hayes Freight Lines, Inc., 348 U. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 3:59 pm
He warns: Today’s unfortunate U.S. [read post]
