Search for: "In INTEREST OF FEW v. State"
Results 3721 - 3740
of 11,571
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2007, 9:50 am
Futures, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 9:39 am
Oct. 14, 2016): “Simply invoking the term ‘initial-interest confusion’ does not state a viable claim. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 3:13 pm
(see the discussion of state court cases below). [read post]
21 May 2009, 7:31 am
(a few solicitors will be rubbing their hands at that one ! [read post]
17 Sep 2024, 7:17 am
Cases of potential interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 6:00 am
In Stewart v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 4:00 am
The state had a 50% royalty interest and was paid independently of the plaintiffs. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
In particular, “Logic clearly dictates that the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:04 am
Remember, this is pediatric surgery, and very few companies sell either drugs or devices specifically intended and approved for use in children. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 12:32 pm
Static Control Components, in which it will consider who has the right to bring a false advertising claim under the federal Lanham Act; and United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 1:58 pm
As elaborated by the Third Circuit in United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 11:21 am
Supreme Court in Nestlé v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 12:44 pm
Parra (Jose) v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 6:46 pm
Summers v. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 8:19 am
UNINSURED EMPLOYERS' FUND V. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 8:40 am
. - Jason By Colleen V. [read post]
17 Dec 2024, 6:45 pm
Peters, L.P. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 10:09 am
One possibility is that plaintiffs’ counsel believes that state courts will be more sympathetic to the interests of local claimants, especially in connection with their claims against out-of-state moneyed interests. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 11:22 am
A few days later, Ms. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:13 am
In March 2004 the arbitration panel ruled in favor of Hancock, and the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, confirmed the award a few months later. [read post]
