Search for: "People v. Mays" Results 3721 - 3740 of 39,685
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2014, 10:29 am
The landowner's actions relying on a valid permit must be so substantial that the municipal action results in serious loss rendering the improvements essentially valueless" (Town of Orangetown v Magee, 88 NY2d at 47-48; see Glacial Aggregates LLC v Town of Yorkshire, 14 NY3d at 136; People v Miller, 304 NY at 109; Matter of RC Enters. v Town of Patterson, 42 AD3d at 544; People ex rel. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 1:34 am
  “If two people try to solve a crossword puzzle together, it may be easy to say who first uttered the correct answer to a clue, but more difficult to answer who contributed to it when the solution emerged from a prior discussion. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 3:59 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
As ACSblog noted, Reinhardt was focused on the targeting of a group of people for ill treatment, rather like the matter that resulted in the Supreme Court’s 1996 opinion in Romer v. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 7:12 am
The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled yesterday, in Warshak v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 10:00 am by Grace Feldman
The California Court of Appeal ruled yesterday in People v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 12:57 pm by Adam Gillette
People with a keen grasp of legal history may recall that from the time that the United States Supreme Court decided Furman v. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 12:38 am
‘Some people will take appropriate action to protect against future wildfires and some will rebuild on the same spot and take no action. [read post]