Search for: "People v. Mays"
Results 3721 - 3740
of 39,096
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2024, 1:09 pm
I often recommend the people read particular opinions that are doctrinally complicated or that contain factually interesting material. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 1:36 pm
Yes, the statute says that people can only be ordered to "attend before them . . . as a witness," and the Ninth Circuit agrees that means at an actual hearing. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 12:12 pm
The DA's Office may perhaps be right that it isn't/wasn't doing anything illegal. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 10:34 am
All from a conviction for which he was sentenced to a fine of $775 and two days credit for time served.On the one hand, we don't need people in the United States who commit fraud. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 3:46 pm
For further reference, if you wish, you may read the underlying opinions in their entirety, which are attached herewith. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 2:11 pm
On the downside, lots of people won't let you sit on a jury.Or is that another upside? [read post]
17 Mar 2018, 6:20 pm
Non-disclosure agreements are inconsistent with the policy when they prevent speech on matters of vital public interest solely because that speech may place powerful people in a bad light. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 4:39 am
Such was the case with Pat V. [read post]
7 May 2010, 1:08 pm
For example, in People v. [read post]
26 May 2013, 6:52 am
Many of the people targeted were American citizens or legal residents. [read post]
11 Jun 2016, 4:10 pm
In her decision in Wong v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 1:50 am
And while the military may make mistakes in releasing people who are dangerous, I would imagine judges will make more. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 2:05 pm
When people hear the word “discrimination,” they may often associate it with historically marginalized groups, like people of color, women, LGBT+ people, and so forth. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 12:00 am
STATE V. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:11 pm
One of the interesting questions coming out of the Supreme Court's decision today in United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2021, 8:31 am
The presenters will also explore the disproportionate victimology of the Native American population and how abiding by non-Indian systems of justice fails Native American people.4:45 – 5:00: Closing [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 7:36 am
In Barbee v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 10:10 am
On July 10th, the client tells you that the merger may be in danger, or they may be rethinking their decision to sue, that the anticipated legal problem may be clearing up on its own, etc. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 11:56 am
In People v. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 9:57 am
This may seem bizarre to those of us who believe that one of the primary functions of unelected constitutional courts is the protection of vulnerable minorities from majoritarian excesses. [read post]
