Search for: "People v. Price"
Results 3721 - 3740
of 4,391
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2025, 7:45 am
How well is New York City’s congestion pricing working 100 days in? [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 6:38 pm
Desde La Habana, el sacerdote de Ifá, Víctor Betancourt, dijo que la oficialista Asociación Cultural Yoruba rompió con los acuerdos establecidos desde 2016 y este año hicieron la ceremonia "a puerta cerrada, sin convocar a nadie de la comisión". [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 4:01 am
”[10] The issue of “healing” is effectively discarded in R. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
As the Court observed in the famous New York Times v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm
People v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 2:07 pm
What the Supreme Court did in Ohio v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 1:08 pm
Whereas the football innovations were all eventually adopted by other teams, Gladwell’s story makes the point that innovations are regularly resisted by people doing well under the current system; in fact they can be crushed if you convince enough people that doing the thing “right” requires avoiding innovation. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:28 am
Some view property tax limitations as a sensible constraint on the growth of government, or as a fail-safe to avoid pricing people out of their own homes. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 11:33 am
DeJoy and Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 9:50 am
(McKenna, 104-105) (quoting Rolex Watch U.S.A. v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 5:08 pm
The threat of category (7), on the other hand, is more theoretical than real at this point because, to date, corporate stock prices generally have not reacted negatively to public disclosure of a hack.[2] As a result, we have not yet seen any significant cyber-breach “stock drop” cases. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
ET AL. v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Securities Litigation, 768 F.3d 1046 (9th Cir. 2014) (violations of Section 303 do not give rise to private right of action under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5) with Stratte-McClure v. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
While most Englishmen preferred their “kinswomen,” he “had found it convenient and pleasant to associate with Indians and he must pay the price” (p. 66). [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 3:00 am
He finds First Amendment invocations mystical; prefers the Mastercard v. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 10:20 pm
If you have enough people, make two responsible for backing up - one to do it, the other to confirm that an [read post]
20 May 2008, 5:24 am
As people know, FDR eventually decided that the justices were the problem, not the Constitution. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 12:51 pm
The case, LePage v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 4:47 am
New York has successfully been doing this for almost 200 years for verdicts that are unreasonable, since Chief Judge James Kent wrote the following in Coleman v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 12:39 pm
Instead, again, they cite to Brown Shoe Co. v. [read post]
