Search for: "People v Long"
Results 3741 - 3760
of 19,569
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2023, 6:54 pm
In a divorce, people do things they should NOT do. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
To download a copy of the Appellate Division’s decision, please use this link: People v. [read post]
2 May 2017, 11:42 am
In Birchfield v. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 12:52 pm
Del Carpio-Diaz v. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 12:22 pm
Cowan v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 8:52 am
Such actions may seemingly be forgotten by the author the next day, but the consequences can be long-lasting. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
This claim is, of course, deeply counterintuitive, and it would be very awkward, to say the least, for the Supreme Court to explain to the American people that Section 3 doesn’t apply to someone who’s been President because although that person held an “office,” it wasn’t an office “of the United States. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 7:14 am
We thought it was kind of funny, but people who work in that office are not laughing. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 6:36 am
She mentioned a long password that her children knew but she did not. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:58 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 10:47 am
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has issued its ruling in Thomas More Law Center v. [read post]
11 Aug 2006, 8:02 pm
In this year's Davis v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 5:46 am
See Mazza v. [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 6:48 pm
People v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 6:06 am
Look no further than Price v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 6:14 pm
However, the long-term implications of this case aren’t entirely clear because the Supreme Court voted 3-1-3: three justices on a plurality opinion, 3 justices (in 2 opinions) in dissent, and a swing-vote concurrence by Justice Kruger. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 8:45 am
(See Wisconsin v Yoder.) [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 8:50 am
(Trustee of) v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 8:30 am
The less people spend, the smaller V, money velocity, becomes. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 1:24 pm
In a Findlaw column on Lopez Torres, Marci Hamilton revisits California Democratic Party v. [read post]
