Search for: "The People v. Cross" Results 3741 - 3760 of 5,469
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2012, 9:15 pm by Kirk Jenkins
Our reports on the civil oral arguments of the Illinois Supreme Court's November term conclude with Poris v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 8:38 am
As Priscilla Robledo explains, here's something that people have been wanting for ages, an IP calendar. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 2:41 pm by Camille Ochoa
Related Cases: Automated License Plate Readers- ACLU of Southern California & EFF v. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 8:20 pm by James Kwong
The theme of the conference is IP and Migration, which aims to highlight movement of people, practices, and technologies from one place to another, crossing physical borders and metaphysical barriers. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
I also pointed out that all sorts of questions remained to be answered.Last week, in Shankar v. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 6:12 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Once you cross from "anonymous" to "personal" data, you'll face a world of ugly consequences if anyone finds out. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 3:00 am by David Oscar Markus
  Here's SCOTUSblog's coverage of the issue:The Justices agreed to hear an appeal by the federal government in United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 5:16 am by Andy
Written statements from a number of other people were relied on by both sides. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 8:44 am by Florian Mueller
On the Internet, those devices are just one Google search away from Apple's German online shop, and in the real world, I doubt there's any Apple Store from which people couldn't find the next point of sale (where those devices continue to be sold) in walking distance--in many cases, it will be like just crossing a street.Headed for an antitrust defeat and failing to gain leverage from patent infringement actions against Apple and Intel, Qualcomm is trying to… [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 3:47 pm by Alex Woolgar
Leaving aside the rather predictable (given the team's public dilation on the issue of a potential name change) instance of trade mark squatting, most of the IP interest came from proceedings in the TTAB and the District Court of Virginia, and the subsequent ruling of the Supreme Court in Matal v Tam. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 1:56 am by Ben
One would think that Shields has a good case that the uses constitute "fair use" - not least from the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Bill Graham Archives v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 5:14 pm by Jason Kelley
Cindy first became involved with EFF in 1993, when EFF asked her to serve as the outside lead attorney in Bernstein v. [read post]