Search for: "Bange v. State"
Results 361 - 380
of 470
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2011, 1:53 pm
Conference on Rare Diseases and Orphan Products started with a bang today with the release of a landmark report announcing its findings of flexibility in FDA’s review of potential treatments for patients with rare (“orphan”) diseases. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 1:16 pm
In SASCO v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 3:47 am
Flintshire argued, drawing on the judgment of Lord Hailsham in London & Clydeside States Ltd v Aberdeen DC [1980] WLR 182, that this was at the lower end of the spectrum of procedural defects so as to enable the court to find that Mrs Tyrrell's review was not a nullity. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 7:37 am
” Among the items he cited was “the biggest booster since the Apollo-era Saturn V [that] is well on its way to launching a new American journey into deep space. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 7:29 pm
" United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 3:47 am
Flintshire argued, drawing on the judgment of Lord Hailsham in London & Clydeside States Ltd v Aberdeen DC [1980] WLR 182, that this was at the lower end of the spectrum of procedural defects so as to enable the court to find that Mrs Tyrrell's review was not a nullity. [read post]
8 May 2012, 3:10 am
In People v Campos, 2012 NY Slip Op 02267, an interesting scenario evolved. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 8:01 am
Many state owned enterprises do not see other SOEs or even the Chinese government itself as separate competitors. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC: In re Comiskey rehearing en banc falls two votes short; important dissent by Moore J (Hal Wegner) (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) District Court Delaware: Document shredding voids 12 Rambus patents: Rambus v Micron… [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 6:55 pm
State v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 1:36 pm
Bang. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 8:33 am
While 2020 will likely be the year in which the climax events of 2019 will play themselves out, the year 2019 was in many ways the year of the "big bang" for the third decade of the 21st century.Indeed, 2019 was rich with rupture-climax events. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 12:44 pm
Justice Ginsburg is up next with Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 1:40 pm
By Andrew DelaneyYustin v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:50 pm
Gillies, Comment, Not with a bang, but a whimper: Congress’s proposal to overturn the Supreme Court’s Leegin decision with the Discount Pricing Consumer Protection Act of 2009, 18 VILLANOVA SPORTS & ENTERTAINMENT LAW JOURNAL 645 (2011)Nathaniel Grow, Louisville v. [read post]
1 Oct 2016, 6:04 pm
District Court for the Southern District of California, Hammock et al. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 2:51 am
What the 5th Circuit did, in Ibarra v. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 5:58 pm
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s opinion in Heddings v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 12:11 am
” However, with enough coordinated large trades in the one minute window (in a process known as “banging the close”), it could be possible to manipulate the “fixes. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 8:01 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
