Search for: "Employment Division v. Smith"
Results 361 - 380
of 639
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2022, 12:00 pm
Since Everson that interest, with only a few exceptions like Employment Division v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 11:09 pm
Supreme Court ruling in the case of Employment Division v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 1:25 pm
I think that it's hard to make much of these statements by themselves; they simply reflect the Court's holding in Employment Division v. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 9:29 am
Justice Scalia found this possibility so disturbing that he rejected it out of hand in Employment Division v. [read post]
21 May 2021, 10:20 am
Smith and Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye Inc. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
Kentucky could provide that employees with religious objections to performing some of their duties may assign them to deputy clerks, so long as the public still receives non-discriminatory service.Alternatively, the Supreme Court itself could overrule its 1990 decision in Employment Division v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:05 pm
” In Scott v Wetzler, 195 AD2d 905, the Appellate Division, Third Department rejected Scott’s argument that he was denied due process because the Section 75 hearing officer allowed evidence concerning his performance evaluations to be introduced during the disciplinary hearing. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 9:04 am
The specific issues before the Court are: “whether free exercise plaintiffs can only succeed by proving a particular type of discrimination claim — namely that the government would allow the same conduct by someone who held different religious views — as two circuits have held, or whether courts must consider other evidence that a law is not neutral and generally applicable, as six circuits have held; (2) whether Employment Division v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
For years, many religious conservatives and some liberal proponents of religious accommodations have made common cause to read RFRA broadly and, when that was not sufficient, to argue that the Supreme Court should reverse Employment Division v. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 6:11 am
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON In re: GYPC, INC., Debtor Case No. 17‐31030 Adv. [read post]
9 May 2021, 4:48 am
” McLauchlan v. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 8:30 am
ALAN SMITH, the Ward, Appellant, v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 5:43 am
The similarities between City of Boerne and the Title VI regulations are many: Just as the Supreme Court has authoritatively held that Fourteenth Amendment free exercise violations occur only when the state acts purposely to constrict free exercise, see Employment Division v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 12:15 pm
” The law was passed in 1993, in reaction to the Supreme Court’s decision three years earlier in Employment Division v. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 11:36 am
Smith. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 1:15 pm
RFRA was enacted in 1993 to restore the Court’s free exercise case law as it existed before the Court’s decision in Employment Division v. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 9:01 pm
Justice Antonin Scalia wrote the brilliant, and controversial, 1990 decision, Employment Division v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 12:33 pm
Roman Catholic Diocese also invites the court to overrule Employment Division v. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 3:30 pm
Smith. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 9:11 pm
" The Appellate Division affirmed defendant's conviction, and a judge of the Court of Appeals granted defendant leave to appeal to this court. [read post]
