Search for: "Gould v. Gould" Results 361 - 380 of 940
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2009, 10:12 am
I agree with Judge Gould that this is clearly a prudential (non-Article III) impediment and that, especially in cases like this one, it makes sense to resolve the appeal.So if you're a federal courts person and/or a procedure guru, here's a nice little case for your morning reading. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 9:42 am
Four strong conservatives -- Judges O'Scannlain, Rymer, Bybee, and Randy Smith -- plus Judge Tallman (a reliably conservative Clinton appointee) and Judge Gould (Clinton). [read post]
16 May 2011, 2:15 pm
  In the end, Judge O'Scannlain writes a majority opinion (joined by Judge Alarcon) that says there should be heightened scrutiny for virtually all Second Amendment claims, while Judge Gould concurs and argues -- borrowing from First Amendment principles -- that there should be heightened scrutiny only for "core" Second Amendments claims (like "core" speech) and that (as with speech) reasonable time, place and manner restrictions should be fine.It's an… [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 6:44 am by David Cruz
Cruz, Professor of Law at the University of Southern California Gould School of Law. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 1:17 pm
But Judge Gould goes on in Section B to say that, as a matter of law, the failure to grant relief here would be an abuse of discretion. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 11:10 am
  The Supreme Court decided a case in 1990, Illinois v. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 3:13 am by David Cruz
Cruz is a Professor of Law at the University of Southern California Gould School of Law. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 8:07 pm by zshapiro
In its first criminal justice decision of the 2010-1011 session, Abbott v. [read post]