Search for: "In INTEREST OF FEW v. State"
Results 361 - 380
of 12,048
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2016, 6:48 am
State v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 4:21 am
” State v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 8:03 am
To the surprise of no one who has been paying attention, the June 26, 2013 United States Supreme Court opinions in the cases of United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 8:35 pm
I blogged about States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 12:00 am
This raises an interesting point about U.S. law: state actions can mediate the implementation of federal food law and lead to federal law or policy changes. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am
” Such an abstract interest is rarely a matter of importance to a court adjudicating a case. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 4:50 pm
Part V concludes that many other states in Asia already or potentially negotiating treaties with Australia – including Japan and China – are also unlikely to achieve a relaxation of the policy stance. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:08 am
Justice BhandariThe Supreme Court in State of Uttranchal v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 7:05 am
Here are a few recent items related to electronic privacy that may interest Grits readers:Check out a recent GAO report titled, "Information Resellers: Consumer Privacy Framework Needs to Reflect Changes in Technology and Marketplace" (pdf). [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 1:08 pm
The state has a greater interest in protecting private individuals such as Mr. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 8:01 am
A few interesting odds and ends I’ve come across recently, spanning a few topics. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 6:25 pm
Baltimore, and Dred Scott v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 2:19 pm
And in State v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 4:55 pm
The Court of Justice of the European Union (the “CJEU”) has handed down a few intermediary-related judgments since September alone, and two are considered below. [read post]
27 Jan 2025, 9:01 pm
A few months ago I wrote on this website about one such episode—a case in which the U.S. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 5:01 am
We discuss these reasons in the next few posts. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 5:00 am
See Mercier v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 8:16 am
A 1781 Pennsylvania state court case against the state of Virginia, Nathan v. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 8:58 am
DOJ lawyers made a point of telling the judge that it wasn't until just a few days ago that NAR demonstrated any willingness to settle the case (he was presumably referring to statements made in the status report that I circulated on Monday).NAR, as was stated in the status report, intends to file a motion to dismiss. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
We are examining the recent decision by the Delaware Supreme Court in Gantler v. [read post]
