Search for: "In re Hoffman"
Results 361 - 380
of 879
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2011, 11:43 am
Hoffman: Judge --THE COURT: Okay. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 10:59 pm
Dustin Hoffman 11. [read post]
15 May 2023, 11:43 am
We're with Andreesen and Elon, obviously. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 10:39 am
The Section puts out an outstanding quarterly publication The Advocate, edited by Lonny Hoffman of Houston, which deals with significant issues in litigation in Texas courts. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 2:32 pm
DunnImproper probation condition in re searchesState v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 7:15 am
They also contended that federal appeals courts have ruled prisoners may be put to death as long as they understand the punishment and why they're receiving it. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 6:00 am
Pittsburgh (like many re-emerging economies) is in dire need of thoughtful law and policy analysis. [read post]
1 May 2008, 4:08 am
That's about the private office building that Hoffman Construction is building across First Avenue. [read post]
10 May 2018, 9:07 pm
” Full text here, and earlier FCPA coverage here, here, here, here, and here [cross-posted and expanded from Cato at Liberty] A few more links: Mike Koehler/FCPA Professor on the Total case as “cash cow”; Manhattan Institute 2013 report and more coverage on now-dormant Point of Law; Brian Hoffman, Holland & Hart; Foley & Lardner. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 2:26 pm
Dave Hoffman makes this point quite well at Conglomerate. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 5:30 pm
– Cincinnati lawyer Craig Hoffman of Baker Hostetler on the firm’s Data Privacy Monitor From Where Can You Legally Get Your First Marijuana Crop? [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 8:58 am
” In re Gentile, 483 B.R. 50, 53 (Bankr. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 7:17 pm
In re Does, — S.W.3d —, 2011 WL 1447544 (Texas, April 15, 2011) The issue of anonymity is a hot topic in internet law. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 10:00 pm
Arthur Greig * Liz & Lonny Gross * Susan Gwertzman * Jason Haber * Larry Hirsch * Jane Hoffman * Hon. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 9:03 am
Part II shows how issue preclusion (in res judicata) was reconceived in the course of the nineteenth century, morphing from a doctrine focused on the relitigation of particular facts, to a doctrine concerned with legal issues, now understood as involving legal conclusions based on facts. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 9:17 am
Part II shows how issue preclusion (in res judicata) was reconceived in the course of the nineteenth century, morphing from a doctrine focused on the relitigation of particular facts, to a doctrine concerned with legal issues, now understood as involving legal conclusions based on facts. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 12:01 am
I found it excellent as well, but the fact is, when you’re writing about a true giant of a man like Marshall, it’s hard to go wrong. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 9:31 am
But hey, the deadline for filing for county offices is March 11 -- roughly three business weeks away -- and we're thinking someone else could be jumping into that one. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 4:54 pm
In an earlier post here, Dave Hoffman adds another quibble about Brian Leiter's citation rankings of law professors. [read post]
3 May 2007, 11:24 am
We're just trying to get a general sense of how many of you agree, and how many of you disagree, with what Edwards Angell did.) [read post]
