Search for: "In re INITIATIVE STATE QUESTION NO. 10."
Results 361 - 380
of 4,391
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2013, 3:18 am
Often the details of services, their launch date, budget, and how they’re operated are set in legislation. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm
On the other hand, on the question of time limits connected with the initiation of the legal process, the EBA pointed out that, in the course of the preparatory work on the EPC, a majority of the Working Party which had looked into the scope of re-establishment of rights had considered that re-establishment should not apply to the opponent because he had other means of availing himself of his rights, in particular by bringing an action for revocation before the… [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 9:42 am
The question then becomes what would we do? [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 5:52 am
Mar. 10, 2008), decision available here. [read post]
30 May 2013, 5:01 pm
Initially an annotation was entered into the system to the effect that no action should be taken in the absence of instructions from Mr Z. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 11:49 am
More on eyewitness ID from the states will be in the next post. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 2:11 pm
Compare these numbers with what existed in 2007, a “normal” economic year when initial claims and weekly certifications were around 10 questions each and could be filed via a phone call. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 6:00 am
(Under the Los Angeles ordinance, new requirements arise when the applicant provides any additional information upon receipt of the employer’s first notice and its initial completed assessment: the employer receiving that additional information must then complete a re-assessment and provide the applicant with a copy of it while notifying the applicant of the final decision.) [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 6:00 am
(Under the Los Angeles ordinance, new requirements arise when the applicant provides any additional information upon receipt of the employer’s first notice and its initial completed assessment: the employer receiving that additional information must then complete a re-assessment and provide the applicant with a copy of it while notifying the applicant of the final decision.) [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 4:11 am
Why not 14 or 10? [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 10:26 am
The department credits its initiatives and the work of states passing distracted driving laws. [read post]
10 Jun 2007, 4:18 pm
At the selectmen’s May 10 meeting, Democratic Selectman Gordon Frassinelli questioned the utility and deterrent value of the ban, likening the initial written warning and $100 fine on the second offense to an unshoveled sidewalk violation. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 1:26 pm
For instance, you may have only 10 days after the judgement is entered to ask the court to re-open the record to get new evidence entered not initially addressed at trial. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 5:01 am
Trump lost all 10. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 2:01 am
Make Sure You’re Compliant with Applicable Laws Organizations are often surprised to learn that even though they operate a privately-owned business with a moderate number of employees or contractors, they’re still bound by state and federal labor and employment laws. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 10:47 am
By now, you’ve probably heard about the foreclosure crisis; namely, about all the questionable paperwork and procedures banks have been using to initiate foreclosures. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 1:04 pm
If in fact the appellant did in fact make the argument we initially thought it didn't. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 11:50 am
You're going to find that rather difficult. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 5:00 am
”In cooperative federalism, states and local governments willingly participate in federal initiatives. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 9:30 am
” That statement (or perhaps it was a question) went unanswered. [read post]
