Search for: "Katz v. United States"
Results 361 - 380
of 1,047
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2015, 9:53 pm
Cogan transfer the relevant files to another law firm, Welsh & Katz, to continue prosecution before the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”). [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 9:01 pm
United States. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 11:08 am
Supreme Court held, in Katz v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 9:43 pm
” United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
’” Friedman-Katz v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 10:17 am
Cogantransfer the relevant files to another law firm, Welsh &Katz, to continue prosecution before the United StatesPatent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”). [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 7:42 am
In each case, the warrantless placement of the GPS on the defendant’s vehicle occurred before the 2012 United States Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 8:47 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 11:20 am
” United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 6:24 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit reversed Jones's conviction `because of admission of the evidence obtained by warrantless use of the GPS device. . . . [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 9:30 am
”) Katz v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:01 am
United States, 320 U.S. 1, 60–61 (1943) (Frankfurter, J., dissenting in part) (‘‘it is an old observation that the training of Anglo–American judges ill fits them to discharge the duties cast upon them by patent legislation’’); Parke–Davis & Co. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 6:23 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Katz v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 9:27 am
Klayman tells the panel that he doesn’t trust the United States’ explanation for his clie [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:06 pm
The Court noted that Justice Sotomayor, in United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 9:30 am
Tracey sets up a particularly interesting dynamic in the Eleventh Circuit, which has a cell-site case pending en banc in United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 8:00 am
United States (389 U.S. 347). [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 1:33 pm
And in United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 6:16 pm
United States, 265 F.3d 1371, 1376 (Fed. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 2:06 pm
United States, 533 U.S. 27, 33 (2001); see Katz v. [read post]
