Search for: "Kelly v. United States" Results 361 - 380 of 894
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2010, 8:36 am by Joseph C. McDaniel
Don't have any now.SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATESNO. 08-998JAN HAMILTON, CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE, PETITIONER v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Scalia, J., thought Presidents were "officers of the United States" (Lawfare). [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 2:34 pm by David Klein
As our readers are by now aware, on June 28, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States overturned a legal precedent known as “Chevron deference” by a 6-3 vote. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 3:51 am by Edith Roberts
At the ABA Journal, Mark Walsh previews one of tomorrow’s cases, Kelly v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 12:52 pm by Alison Rowe
; Case 4:09-CV-00456-A in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (Fort Worth Division). [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 2:01 pm by John Bellinger
  Or would they have insisted that they all be moved to the United States? [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 6:00 am by Beth Graham
Morris case that is currently being considered, along with two similar cases, by the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 11:10 pm
Carcieri,   the state itself, and the town of Charlestown — were united in the claim that the federal government has no authority to do that for the Narragansetts. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 4:24 pm
Geerken contends that the district court erred in calculating his sentencing range under the advisory United States Sentencing Guidelines ("U.S.S.G. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 12:51 pm by James Eckert
The due process guarantees in the United States and New York Constitutions require that a defendant be afforded notice of the hearing to determine his or her risk level pursuant to SORA and a meaningful opportunity to respond to the risk level assessment (see § 168-n [3]; People v David W., 95 NY2d 130, 136-140). [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 3:42 pm
Kelly Issue: Whether 28 U.S.C 2254, the federal habeas provision governing claims adjudicated on the merits in state court, should be applied to claims based on evidence of ineffective assistance of counsel the state court refused to consider. [read post]