Search for: "Law v. United States Department of Agriculture"
Results 361 - 380
of 689
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2016, 5:00 am
United States, 132 S. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 12:00 am
§ 6501 et seq.)The act authorizes the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) to establish regulations governing the practices a producer must use in order to label food organic and procedures for certifying that a producer has followed these practices. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 6:08 am
Department of Agriculture’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 12:00 am
” United States v. 95 Barrels of Alleged Cider, 265 U.S. 438 (1924). [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 10:33 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am
United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
Department of Agriculture, 796 F.3d 445 [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm
Department of Agriculture. [read post]
21 Nov 2015, 6:44 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 11:24 am
Department of Agriculture, the “raisin case” from last Term. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:08 pm
Prior to July of 2003, V&V Enterprises, Inc., did business as Mauro Brand Products and been marketing and selling “pocket sandwiches” since coming under inspection by the USDA in 1991. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 1:22 pm
” Despite this opposition, Rouhani recently announced that “Iran has plans to renew trade with France in car manufacturing, agriculture, and aviation. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 6:59 am
Currently, according to the United States Department of Agriculture, India is the world’s biggest exporter of beef. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 8:01 am
Given this, the Colorado Department of Agriculture has long said that Eagle 20 is fine to use on most vegetation grown in the state, assuming it is within acceptable limits, but cannot be used on tobacco products that could be heated or inhaled. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 11:22 am
United States Department of Agriculture., 760 F.3d 18 (D.C. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 10:27 am
A facial challenge to Act 120 would succeed if a substantial number of its applications are unconstitutional, judged in relation to the statute’s plainly legitimate sweep (United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 10:27 am
A facial challenge to Act 120 would succeed if a substantial number of its applications are unconstitutional, judged in relation to the statute’s plainly legitimate sweep (United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 9:34 am
Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 6:00 am
Department of Agriculture, 760 F.3d 18 (D.C. [read post]
