Search for: "M/V Lord"
Results 361 - 380
of 915
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2011, 5:58 am
If I’m right, it will have a dramatic effect on what they are paying out. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 4:43 am
I’m sure that he is a fine fellow in many ways but I think it’s a bit like putting the regulation of door-to-door salesmen in the hands of Boston Strangler. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 11:13 am
Collins J cites Lord Woolf in M v Home Office [1994] 1 A.C. 377 While contempt proceedings … against a government department or a minister in an official capacity would not be either personal or punitive (it would clearly not be appropriate to fine or sequestrate the assets of the Crown or a government department or an officer of the Crown acting in his official capacity), this does not mean that a finding of contempt against… [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 11:13 am
The LORD is good and we will continue to serve HIM with all our heart.'" The court noted that a ban on threats of discrimination is constitutional: The Supreme Court's decision in Rumsfeld v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 7:23 am
Rex v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 7:55 am
Speakers included prominent members of the judiciary, such as Lord Hoffmann and Lord Justice Jacob from the UK and the Hon. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 11:29 pm
I’m afraid this puts me in mind of judges dancing on the head of a pin. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 5:53 am
Khan v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 3:05 am
M. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 1:02 am
Tessa] Significant News A big news item for me and my homelessness colleagues was announced last week, ending a court process that has taken 2 years to decide what Lord Neuberger meant by the word ‘Significantly’ in the appeal hearing for Hotak v. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 8:56 am
For their part, they argued that there was no question of a constitutional right to trial by jury being at issue, rather it has already been recognised that there is an emphasis against trial by jury as reiterated by Lord Bingham MR in Aitken v Preston ([1997] EMLR 415). [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 11:45 am
All of the elements of the claim that could be discerned from Mr M’s narrative Particulars either amounted to “full frontal attacks on the findings of the Judge’, and were thus an abuse of process, or the sort of decision that that a court can and should determine summarily as amounting to no more than an error of judgment rather than negligence, to use the words of Lord Steyn in Arthur JS Hall v Simons. [read post]
Northern Ireland District Judge acquits Pastor of “gross offence” against Muslims – Rosalind English
17 Feb 2016, 4:40 pm
(Jalāl ad-Dīn Muhammad Rūmī , 13th Century Persian Islamic scholar and poet)These words were the last in the ruling by DJ McNally in the Belfast county court, acquitting Pastor McConnell of grossly offending Muslims in a sermon that had been delivered in church but also transmitted over the internet (DPP v McConnell [2016] NI Mag 1). [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 5:43 am
People 10 (1954) (attacking the absolute veto held by the House of Lords prior to the Parliament Act of 1911). [3] See Alexander M. [read post]
11 May 2009, 11:38 am
A v Croydon and M v Lambeth, a related case, had previous had a hearing on the issue of whether the absence of any right to appeal or make representations on the LA’s assessment of age was a breach of Art 6. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 8:38 pm
See State v. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 3:06 pm
But there is nothing in the Act to preclude an authority from deciding that it is reasonable for an applicant to continue to occupy accommodation which is temporary: R (Awua) v Brent LBC at 68 per Lord Hoffmann, approved in Birmingham CC v Ali (2009) UKHL 36, [2009] 1 WLR 1506 at (41), and followed in Muse v Brent LBC at (8). [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
The ECHR in McCann v UK (see our notes here and here) preferred Lord Bingham's approach. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
The ECHR in McCann v UK (see our notes here and here) preferred Lord Bingham's approach. [read post]
22 Jul 2017, 10:48 am
v=X5hrUGFhsXo) Some Germans, but mostly French. [read post]
