Search for: "Matter of Grand Jury Proceeding (Doe)"
Results 361 - 380
of 854
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2019, 5:00 am
When the President gave the order, “substantial evidence” (to quote the Report) existed that the President was aware that he was under investigation by a federal prosecutor who could present evidence of the President’s criminality to a grand jury, which satisfies the nexus requirement. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 10:15 pm
The cases relied upon the defendant where the waivers that were the subject of the recession, i.e., to a jury trial, a defendant's right to be present at sidebar conferences, the revocation of a waiver to testify before a grand jury prior to the filing of an indictment, or the revocation of a waiver to a speedy trial, did not implicate facts previously conceded. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 8:39 am
So, for instance, a criminal defendant can testify before the grand jury or at a preliminary hearing but refuse to testify at trial. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:18 am
About two years ago a perspective client came into my office with a police report and grand jury minutes. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 2:34 pm
Nor, for that matter, does a defendant have an adequate opportunity to assert constitutional violations in the state proceeding when the prosecution itself is the constitutional violation. [read post]
16 May 2011, 4:13 pm
Does the client receive SSI? [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
Shepard contends that had the “other side” learned of the intended grand jury report, “it might have moved swiftly to seek a finding before Sirica or on appeal that the grand jury had no authority to issue any report at all. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:32 am
Brooks would have convinced a subsequent grand jury not to indict him. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 10:57 am
Evid. 606, the deliberations of courts and grand and petit juries areprivileged to the extent that such matters are privileged in trial of criminal cases in the United States district courts, but the results of the deliberations are not privileged.Mil. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 4:00 am
No matter which jury Mr. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 9:38 am
(Note: points 2 and 3 apply in either a grand jury proceeding or a criminal trial.) 4. [read post]
12 May 2019, 1:01 pm
In other words, if Goldsmith is right, it is lawful for the president to, say, walk into a grand jury and lie knowingly and intentionally and repeatedly as long as there’s some plausible argument, even an attenuated one, that the lies are intended to protect, say, a secret diplomatic initiative. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am
Rybolovlev admitted that it’s hard for him to trust people, but once he does, he trusts them entirely. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 5:01 am
§3733(i)(3) provides: "(3) USE OF MATERIAL, ANSWERS, OR TRANSCRIPTS IN OTHER PROCEEDINGS- Whenever any attorney of the Department of Justice has been designated to appear before any court, grand jury, or Federal agency in any case or proceeding, the custodian of any documentary material answers to interrogatories, or transcripts of oral testimony received under this section may deliver to such attorney such material, answers, or transcripts for official… [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 2:32 pm
The court orders that defendant is held for the Grand Jury. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 9:00 am
In response to Goldsmith, Benjamin Wittes argued first that Goldsmith’s argument would lead to an absurd conclusion: If the clear statement rule applied to the perjury statute, which also doesn’t by its terms apply to the president, the president could lie to a grand jury, which would have “come as a surprise to Bill Clinton. [read post]
2 May 2012, 4:22 pm
Normally grand jury proceedings are confidential. [read post]
4 May 2018, 8:30 am
The question is what happens if the president refuses to meet with investigators and Mueller issues a subpoena to compel his testimony before a grand jury. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 5:15 am
Still less does it forbid the sentencing judge from imposing a sentence higher than the Guidelines provide for the jury-determined facts standing alone. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 7:48 am
That is, it must be Grand Jury testimony, a written statement that was either adopted or somehow approved by the witness, or a contemporaneous and substantially verbatim recital of an oral statement. [read post]
