Search for: "Matter of Mark T." Results 361 - 380 of 14,391
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2023, 1:42 am by Sean Hayes
If you don’t want the added cost of litigating a matter in a Korean court, please register your trademark in Korea. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 9:58 am by BLOG
Facebook Inc. will probably put off its initial public offering until 2012, giving Chief Executive Officer Mark Zuckerberg more time to gain users and boost sales, three people familiar with the matter said. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 10:12 am by Lisa Ouellette
As a matter of current doctrine, stronger marks receive a broader scope of protection. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 10:12 am by Lisa Ouellette
As a matter of current doctrine, stronger marks receive a broader scope of protection. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The word mark was allegedly removed before the goods were shipped in commerce (which wouldn’t matter anyway, under Dastar). [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 12:30 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Certification marks can’t be used by certifying entity, and as a pragmatic matter most orgs had similarity b/t mark and organization name. [read post]
24 Feb 2025, 8:33 am by Marcel Pemsel
The matter represented by dotted lines is not part of the mark and serves only to show the position of the mark. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 4:29 pm
The DPMA (see IPKat report here) decided in the BSGE's favour and invalidated the mark, according to media reports, the DPMA found that "Neuschwanstein" was an "often used", non-distinctive term" and thus not capable to indicate trade origin of the goods and services marketed under the sign.The German Federal Patent Court has now decided this matter and issued a press release confirming that it has upheld the DPMA's decision to cancel the… [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 8:31 am
It took me half the year, but today marks the end of my list of Top 10 Mistakes in Arguing on Appeal to the BPAI. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 11:48 am
AT&T Techs., Inc., 789 F.2d 1518 (11th Cir. 1986); Silas v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 9:33 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The court first found that “overhead” is generic as a matter of law: it is the common name of the general category of goods or services. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Such a reference, however, has no clear technical meaning and it is doubtful whether and how a material referred to in this way can be unambiguously distinguished from another material (see T 480/98 [5.3]).[5.3.1] Such a trade mark (Handelsmarke) is not suitable for unambiguously identifying a material, also because it can be modified at any time over the course of time. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 10:35 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Although the inclusion of the proposed mark in longer domain names was evidence, even strong evidence, of genericness, consumer surveys also matter. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 11:01 pm by Jack Bogdanski
And I'll tell you what, the water and sewer bills aren't helping matters, either. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 9:13 pm by Dennis Crouch
As a policy matter, a single color product design mark is much more problematic for competition than a multi-color product packaging mark is. [read post]