Search for: "People v. House"
Results 361 - 380
of 12,865
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2016, 11:43 am
I've said some good things recently about good opinions and good people. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 10:11 am
The Supreme Court will soon hear oral arguments in Fulton v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 8:09 pm
Co. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 12:05 pm
Federal Housing Finance Agency, Civil Action No. 10-1165 (HHK).) [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 9:06 am
New York concerns an attempt by the Trump administration to exclude people living in the US illegally from being counted in the 2020 census for apportionment of seats in the House of Representatives. [read post]
12 Jan 2008, 3:13 pm
The case is People v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 1:46 pm
People v. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 3:13 pm
The comments are detailed and very helpful, adding a lot to my scanty commentary, so, for the housing lawyers amongst us, it is well worth reading their comments on my posts on Shala v Birmingham Aweys v Birmingham Omar v Birmingham and now Doherty v Birmingham (House of Lords bound, apparently) And to the CLP people, lovely to see you here, what took you so long? [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 1:51 am
Steeves, 525 F.2d 33, 38 (8th Cir. 1975) (upholding a warrant on the basis that "people who own pistols generally keep them at home or on their persons"); United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:26 am
The closest parallel was that in Mansell v Herbert’s Case (1555) 2 Dyer 128b 73 ER 279, where in the course of an attack on a house by a group of men a woman was killed by a stone thrown by one of the group at another person. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 7:34 pm
Group v. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 4:50 pm
Rasul v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 1:24 am
However, the Scottish court found that such an interference was justified as compensating people who develop pleural plaques was a legitimate aim. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 7:29 am
Davis v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 10:02 am
Senate President Thomas V. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 8:22 am
People v Holmes, 2011 NY Slip Op 8075, 2011 N.Y. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 5:04 am
To do so would be a continuation of putting the 'foxes in charge of the henhouse'.Please also make sure the White House is aware of Judge Davis's remarks in Capitol v. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 11:55 am
In today’s case (McMyn v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 1:04 pm
" UCS said that according to the Clean Air Act -- and reinforced by a 2001 Supreme Court decision in Whitman v. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 6:16 am
People v. [read post]
