Search for: "People v. Superior Court" Results 361 - 380 of 3,280
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2011, 11:09 am by Steve Peltin
The Court of Appeals also disagreed with the sanctions imposed by the Superior Court. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 9:58 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Superior Court, federal district courts around the country have wrestled with whether they may exercise personal jurisdiction over employers as to FLSA claims brought by people who worked and were paid outside of the forum state. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 2:33 pm by National Indian Law Library
Fond Du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa (Indian Gaming Regulatory Act)* State Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/currentstate.htmCases featured: People v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 4:47 pm by Steven G. Pearl
The Court (Los Angeles Superior, Judge White) granted the motion: First, the court concluded that the holding of Fitz-Gerald v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 12:53 pm
Superior Court (1996) 14 Cal.4th 294, 302.) [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
When there is evidence of real risk of such violence—for instance, possible physical retaliation against people who cooperated with the government[21] or risk of violence against an asylum seeker in his home country[22]—courts do indeed generally allow pseudonymity, entirely apart from whether the violence stems from religious views.[23] The same would apply to people who fear religion-related violence, as in Doe v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 12:00 pm by Brad Pauley
Frazer (1999) 21 Cal.4th 737, 775, fn. 32 [Court requested supplemental post-argument briefing regarding a statute’s constitutionality]; People v. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 2:42 pm by Russell Knight
Many people who interact with the Illinois family system hold it in very low regard. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 1:42 pm
Here's a report of a lawsuit filed on March 2 in Superior Court in Oakland, California: Rev. [read post]
7 May 2010, 3:25 am
Gardner v Broderick, 392 US 273 and People v Corrigan, 80 NY2d 326 discuss the parameters of immunity in connection with compelling a public officer or employee to answer questions concerning his or her performance of official duties.If, however, an individual fails to answer questions truthfully where he or she has use or transactional immunity, such immunity does not prevent the fact that he or she answered falsely from being used against the individual if he or she is… [read post]