Search for: "Phillips v. United States"
Results 361 - 380
of 988
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2021, 2:22 pm
” Phillips v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 7:56 am
The United States is, in many ways, still recovering from the economic crisis that began in 2008, with millions of people still unemployed or underemployed. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 4:28 am
He successfully argued on behalf of the Sac and Fox Nation in the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of Oklahoma Tax Commission v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 4:32 am
United States, 893 P.2d 345 (Nev. 1995); Smith v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 4:30 am
Coverage of the four-four tie in United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 9:22 pm
Phillips v. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 4:40 am
§ 105 that works of the United States government may not receive copyright protection, therefore also placing it in the public domain.However, as a copyright owned by a private individual, the Aboriginal flag is subject to the Australian standard duration of copyright protection - the period of Mr Thomas’s life plus 70 years - and will not otherwise enter the public domain until this period is over.Solutions? [read post]
22 May 2015, 12:26 pm
They include: (1) Nonnon v City of New York;2 (2) Simpson v City of New York;3 (3) Irizarry v City of New York;4 (4) Carollo v City of New York;5 (5) Walsh v City of New York;6 (6) Arisio v City of New York;7 (7) Parmigiano v City of New York;8 (8) Phillips v City of New York;9 and (9) Nessen v City of New York.10 There were 29 plaintiffs in the original nine actions. [read post]
8 Apr 2018, 9:46 am
The Ninth then decided United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 8:07 am
Davidson, et al v. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 7:40 pm
, this supposed disanalogy sets the stage for a further argument: if business owners (like Jack Phillips) or religious social service agencies (like Catholic Social Services, in Fulton) who sincerely object to same-sex marriage are denied exemptions from state or local antidiscrimination laws, they are being branded and treated as bigots argument. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 12:07 pm
§ 14-2-309(a)(v).II. [read post]
4 Aug 2018, 3:12 pm
Brenna Gautam recounted last week’s military commisions developments in United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 3:43 am
They stem from the long-established principle of United Kingdom public law that statutory powers must be used for the purpose for which they were conferred and not for some other purpose: Padfield v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food [1968] AC 997. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 9:25 am
Phillips v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:46 pm
The CAFC noted: The assignments, how- ever, make the relevant comparison between the claims of the ’516 patent, which define the inventions claimed therein, Phillips v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:14 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 10:28 am
In commentary at CNN International, Aaron Carroll weighs in, describing this Term as “a pivotal moment for the Supreme Court, for politics, and for the future of health care reform in the United States. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 10:06 am
Bloomsbury International Ltd v Sea Fish Industry Authority and DEFRA [2011] UKSC 25 has its origins in a claim brought by importers unhappy with the imposition of a levy. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 2:41 pm
The biggest problem with Alice’s case (presented by Carter Phillips) is its similarity to Bilski v. [read post]
