Search for: "Plante v. State"
Results 361 - 380
of 4,069
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2011, 3:31 am
Yesterday we talked about the 8th District’s decision in State v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 1:20 pm
Campbell, James V. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 6:14 am
In Matter of Laidlaw Energy and Environmental Inc. v Town of Ellicottville, the court found that the conclusion contained in the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) findings that "serious increases in harmful emissions" from the plant would result in an "unacceptable adverse impact" was not arbitrary and should be upheld. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 4:22 pm
In New Jersey v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 4:50 am
El Paso Marketing, LP v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm
Nevertheless, the OD dealt with the objection in substance […] by stating that claims 1 and 2 of auxiliary request II were not limited to a single plant variety and were therefore allowable under A 53(b) and R 23b(4) EPC 1973. [23] Under these circumstances the objection under A 100(a) in conjunction with A 53(b) against product claims relating to tomato fruits cannot be regarded as a fresh ground of opposition which may be introduced in the appeal proceedings only with the… [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 4:24 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 7:54 am
Supreme Court reversed the precedent-setting decision in Connecticut v. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 5:28 am
The Florida Supreme Court upheld Florida v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 9:02 am
Hans v. [read post]
16 Oct 2024, 1:32 pm
That case, Ohio v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 9:56 pm
Bowman v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 3:47 pm
According to Alaska State Troopers, Rick Ross, 57, Sam Pavala, 49 and Angela Chingliak were returning to Goodnews from the Coastal Villages Seafood plant in Platinum with donated food when tragedy struck. [read post]
10 Dec 2011, 4:50 am
State, 856 So. 2d 1133, 1138 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003) (citing Benefield v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 8:31 am
That happened in Cornwell v. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 7:27 am
The appellant argued that the VAT was a mandatory inclusion in his price which was state imposed and therefore he was collecting on behalf of the state. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 3:00 am
United States. [read post]
1 Aug 2009, 10:21 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 2:08 pm
Ireland ECR [2006] I-4635 (the famous "MOX Plant" case, see our post here) but that case concerned disputes between member States and the exclusive jurisdiction of the Court of Justice laid down in what is now Article 258 TFEU (ex Article 226 EC) not between investors and States. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 10:39 am
Circuit Court, leading twenty-one states, the trade group for the power plants, and the trade group for the suppliers of coal to those plants to take the case on to the Supreme Court. [read post]
