Search for: "Range v. Attorney General United States"
Results 361 - 380
of 1,375
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
And in Lawrence v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 10:07 am
Some, to be sure, embraced the distinction between “territorial” and “national” authority that Thomas stresses—although this was a difficult position to maintain when, as the Attorney General observed in 1799, the “governor and all persons in authority” in the Northwest Territory “derive their authority from the present constitution of the United States. [read post]
13 Jan 2025, 6:47 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 3:05 pm
AB 450 grants the California Labor Commissioner or the state’s Attorney General the exclusive authority to initiate civil actions to enforce its provisions. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 1:01 pm
With cases ranging from copyright protection in Star Athletica, LLC v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 4:27 pm
In United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 6:38 pm
” United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:44 am
The plea agreement was negotiated by an Assistant United States Attorney and an Assistant Federal Public Defender. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 6:26 am
In United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 11:56 am
RICO covers a wide range of predicate acts and is notoriously expansive in scope. [read post]
7 Feb 2025, 6:12 am
” The court said relators have “greater independence than a Senate-confirmed United States attorney or assistant attorney general. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 11:47 am
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/289052.opn.doc.pdf Federal Law United States Supreme Court Bond v. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 3:56 pm
Earlier this month a United Kingdom court took their turn on stage in the world-wide Apple v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 4:47 pm
Because statutes enacted under the Spending Clause of the United States Constitution must provide clear notice to the States of their liabilities should they decide to accept federal funding under those statutes, and because we conclude that NCLB fails to provide clear notice as to who bears the additional costs of compliance, we REVERSE the judgment of the district court and REMAND this case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. 08a0007p.06 Blackburn… [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 7:38 am
The General Assembly is now weighing in on the Court of Appeals ruling in Bruce Jones v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:35 pm
The new false marking statute will limit lawsuits to being filed only by the government or those that can show a competitive injury from the false marking: (1) IN GENERAL- Section 292 of title 35, United States Code, is amended– (A) in subsection (a), by adding at the end the following: ‘Only the United States may sue for the penalty authorized by this subsection. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 11:14 am
Cortman for petitioner James Layton, who is now an attorney in private practice but was the solicitor general of Missouri when the state filed its briefs in the case last year, argued on behalf of Missouri. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 2:06 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 2:28 pm
The case is Moncrieffe v. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 9:01 am
Any penalties assessed against the defendant must be paid into the United States; however, the Court can also order a losing party to pay attorneys’ fees to the plaintiff’s firm that brought the case. [read post]
