Search for: "Rebecca Tushnet"
Results 361 - 380
of 563
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2010, 3:33 am
As Rebecca Tushnet noted, the professors’ creative false advertising claims were dismissed before trial, leaving just the defamation. [read post]
23 Aug 2006, 5:05 am
Professor Rebecca Tushnet, Georgetown University Law Center.Douglas W. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 2:52 am
Rebecca Tushnet's 43 (B)log: This blog covers litigation and news pertaining to trademarks and false advertising. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 4:05 pm
More comments on the case: Rebecca Tushnet, Mike Masnick (who has had first-hand dealings with Stayart) and Ars Technica [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:11 am
Rebecca Tushnet, Harvard Law & OTW. [read post]
11 Apr 2025, 12:16 pm
Rebecca Tushnet, Professor of Law, Harvard University Maybe by accident the flip side of Professor Seaver’s talk. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 1:31 pm
Session IV –Subject Matter and Limitations • Rebecca Tushnet Drassinower defines trademark as the right to completely control the meaning of a mark as applied to a good or service: radically unidirectional, like a one-way traffic sign, and a trademark is not and should not be that! [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 7:22 am
Based on the information Professor Rebecca Tushnet has been able to gather about trademark seizures, it appears that the agency does not keep good records and its substantive determinations are guided by materials provided by trademark owners. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 2:29 pm
Maryland (2019) 2020: Paul Finkelman, Supreme Injustice: Slavery in the Nation's Highest Court (2017) Eric Segall, Originalism as Faith (2018) Greg Weiner, The Political Constitution: The Case Against Judicial Supremacy (2019) Robert Ross, The Framers' Intentions: The Myth of the Nonpartisan Constitution (2019) Jack Balkin, The Cycles of Constitutional Time (2020) 2019: Neal Devins, The Company They Keep: How Partisan Divisions Came to the… [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 9:30 pm
Courts may also find other trademark registration laws unconstitutional after Tam, as discussed by Professor Rebecca Tushnet and others concerned about the decision. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 9:51 am
Booking.com Although this case centers around a seemingly narrow question—whether Booking.com’s name can be registered as a trademark—it also raises another question explored in our argument recap by Corynne McSherry of the Electronic Frontier Foundation and law professors Rebecca Tushnet of Harvard Law School and Margaret Du [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 6:51 am
My schedule tends to get busy around each new year, so my year-end recaps keep coming later and later. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 8:16 am
In response to the second proposal, Lyrissa Lidsky, Rebecca Tushnet, and I submitted a short letter to the Florida Bar explaining why this topic remains stupid. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 2:35 pm
Rev. 505 (2010) 10 70 Tushnet, Rebecca Worth a Thousand Words: The Images of Copyright [article] 125 Harv. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 9:30 pm
” The students had already read a note, drawing heavily upon Mark Tushnet’s Making Civil Rights Law, on Corrigan v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 5:33 am
” Rebecca Tushnet, Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center: In First Amendment terms, I like Justice Stewart’s idea about regulating transactions versus regulating in service of some other social goal. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 2:00 pm
Rebecca Tushnet TheFirst Amendment Walks Into a Bar: Trademark Registration and Free Speech Presenter: Deven Desai: Latest Trojan Horse in 1A law. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 10:03 am
Purposes and limits (or not) in modern trademark law: Wendy Gordon, Rebecca Tushnet RT: Stacey Dogan’s statement that as a practical matter we need justifications for copying/free riding—I didn’t want to believe it, but I’m coming around to that view. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 1:05 pm
Rebecca Tushnet, Frank Stanton Professor of First Amendment Law, Harvard Law SchoolEmpirical work: are we running out of trademarks? [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 8:08 am
Rebecca Tushnet, Georgetown University (representing Law Professors on amicus brief)TM is a right to suppress speech. [read post]
