Search for: "Russell Jackson" Results 361 - 380 of 513
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2019, 2:08 pm by Mark Walsh
Jackson, which like the first case is in the procedural category and leads to some glazed eyes in the courtroom. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 7:52 am
Newman Issue: Whether the Sixth Circuit erred in granting habeas relief and applying the "reasonable speculation" rule, when the Michigan state court had applied the Jackson v. [read post]
29 May 2019, 7:15 am by Andrew Hamm
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, was among the counsel to the petitioner in this case.] [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 7:42 pm by B. Keller
The actors’ performances are lackluster: one scene where Ian sits on an Vortis bluff, William Russell looks almost detached and impassive while talking with the Menoptera Vrestin about his hopes for retaking its homeworld–a scene that should be filled with trademark William Russell enthusiasm. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 6:02 am
LaFollette, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, on Wednesday, January 3, 2018 Tags: Board composition, Boards of Directors, Corporate Social Responsibility, Cybersecurity, Diversity, SEC enforcement, Securities enforcement, Securities regulation, Shareholder activism, Taxation The Appointment of Senior Program Fellow Robert Jackson as SEC Commissioner Posted by Kobi Kastiel (Harvard Law School), on Wednesday, January 3,… [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 7:06 am by Kiran Bhat
[Disclosure: The law firm of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents the petitioner in Florence.] [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 2:49 pm by WSLL
Lance, Assistant Attorney GeneralRepresenting Appellee Russell Nomura: David M. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 11:24 am by Adrian Dayton
The top 10 law firms in the Am Law 100 are home to over 17,000 attorneys worldwide — and only two law blogs, Jackson on Consumer Class Actions & Mass Torts (at Skadden) and Product Liability Monitor (at Weil).Russell Jackson, a partner at Skadden, spends 10 hours per week on his Consumer Class Actions & Mass Torts blog. [read post]
15 Dec 2006, 8:21 pm
Jackson, Mark Scott Jackson, Trina Marie Jacques, Daniel Vernon Johnson, Jennifer Ruth Johnson, Daniel Robert Jolicoeur, Kathleen Marie Jordan, Keith Lloyd Jordan, Mark D. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 6:39 am by John Elwood
  (Note that Goldstein, Howe & Russell is counsel of record in Zuress.) [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 3:52 pm
Russell Jackson of Skadden Arps, publisher of the Consumer Class Actions and Mass Torts. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:40 pm by John Elwood
Jackson, 10-735 (which I discussed here in March), and Beer v. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 8:17 pm
  Bill Russell, too, as player-coach of the Celtics, enjoyed success, winning a title in 1968-69; but, Bill Russell was the greatest winner in the history of professional sports. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 3:09 pm by Mark Graber
   Publius would recognize the various themes that are the subject of essays in Part V of this Handbook (Mark Brandon, Oren Gross, Wayne Moore, David Strauss, Ernest Young, John Dinan, Jamal Green, Gerard Magliocca, Vicki Jackson, Heinz Klug, Elizabeth Beaumont, Maxwell Stearns, Paul Kahn). [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 9:59 am by Eric Turkewitz
And traditionally missing were those who had stood in the well of the courtroom with people whose bodies or spirits were broken or severely compromised… Attorney Fee Fight Gets Ugly in World Trade Center Litigation (Plaintiffs’ Legal Fees Being Slashed; Howe & Russell Objects) — Updated x3 (5/28/10) A furious fight over legal fees that erupted from the World Trade Center Disaster Site Litigation returned to public view yesterday. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:00 am by John Ehrett
  Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]