Search for: "State v. Miner"
Results 361 - 380
of 1,380
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2019, 4:41 pm
See Vance v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 7:35 am
Veterans Land Bd. of State, 352 S.W.3d 479 (Tex. 2011), and KCM Financial LLC v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 5:07 am
In Texas Outfitters Limited v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 5:43 am
” And Chesapeake v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 2:57 pm
County of Amador (Newman Minerals, LLC, et al., Real Parties in Interest) (2019) ____ Cal.App.5th ____. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 10:25 am
District Court for the Western District of Louisiana held that a unit operator may not recover post-production costs from an unleased mineral owner’s share of production proceeds in Allen Johnson, et al. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 10:25 am
District Court for the Western District of Louisiana held that a unit operator may not recover post-production costs from an unleased mineral owner’s share of production proceeds in Allen Johnson, et al. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 1:17 pm
In Wildearth Guardians v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 6:26 am
In Bell v. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 12:35 pm
State Farm Mutual Auto. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 5:00 am
” White had also qualified this statement by noting that, “as a citizen,” she may “share” some of the disclosure mandates’ goals (she mentioned the Dodd-Frank Act’s mine safety and conflict minerals provisions) but that, “as the [then-] Chair of the SEC,” White had to question this use of the securities laws. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm
United States The Cyberlaw Clinic reports that it has filed an amicus curiae brief (.pdf) in the United States Supreme Court in Oracle v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 6:41 pm
In his report the Independent Expert on the effects of foreign debt and other related international financial obligations of States on the full enjoyment of human rights, particularly economic, social and cultural rights, presents guiding principles on human rights impact assessments of economic reforms, which set out the human rights principles and standards that apply to States, international financial institutions and creditors when designing, formulating or… [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 12:35 pm
This paper presents a survey of federal and state court decisions on these two questions, hoping to offer some guidance to practitioners. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
”[72] Justice L’Heureux-Dubé, however, did not agree that an expression stated in the positive (i.e., a “significant contributing cause”) meant the same thing as one stated in the negative (i.e., “not a trivial cause”). [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm
Introduction In going all the way to the United States Supreme Court, Kelo v. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 9:00 am
In Kerns v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
“Head-of-state-owned enterprise” immunity. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 9:25 am
The court cited Nava v. [read post]
