Search for: "State v. Buck"
Results 361 - 380
of 1,031
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2009, 3:35 am
State v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 10:39 pm
The ECtHR criticised this “passing the buck” approach of the legislature, stating that it did not consider the constitutional courts to be the appropriate fora for the determination as to whether a woman qualifies for an abortion. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 6:36 am
Ruiz, Jr. was the first Hispanic attorney to argue before the United States Supreme Court in Buck v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 11:45 am
Williams v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 8:23 am
Corp. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 7:38 am
The image is of the Buck v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 11:32 pm
Yesterday (Monday, March 4, 2019) a Qualcomm v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 4:04 am
In Week One, we focused on the only contested County Court race of Lindsay v. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 12:31 am
[16] Buck, supra note 2 [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 10:17 pm
But under City of Chicago v. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 6:48 am
Franchetta here: State v. [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 2:37 pm
Supreme Court in a Texas death penalty/ineffective assistance case, Buck v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 4:27 pm
(United States v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 4:00 am
Buck v. [read post]
6 Apr 2024, 8:47 am
Com. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 9:26 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2016, 9:26 am
In other words, if the state of the case law was fuzzy at the time, the defendants win the case since they cannot be expected to know the state of the law the way a law professor or some other legal expert would. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm
The Court noted the High Court decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2010] EWHC 2866 (Admin) that revocation of the plan by excecutive action was unlawful and also the Court of Appeal decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2011] EWCA Civ 639 that the intended revocation of the regional plan was a material factor that planning authorities could… [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm
The Court noted the High Court decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2010] EWHC 2866 (Admin) that revocation of the plan by excecutive action was unlawful and also the Court of Appeal decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2011] EWCA Civ 639 that the intended revocation of the regional plan was a material factor that planning authorities could… [read post]
