Search for: "State v. Guy"
Results 361 - 380
of 3,951
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2012, 7:33 pm
Three and a half years later, the Sixth Circuit wrote about that night in United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 1:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2009, 12:40 pm
State of Kansas v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 2:16 pm
See United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 5:58 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 8:50 am
S. 461, 487, 488 (2004); United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 7:29 pm
See Columbia v. [read post]
24 Aug 2008, 11:53 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 8:08 pm
In State v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 3:00 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 12:16 pm
A district court judge who, at a bare minimum, definitely recalled this particular defendant and (maybe) what he had promised the last time around.So, this time, when sentencing the guy, one of the things the district court judge was miffed about was the prior (alleged) broken promise. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 8:00 am
(As well as contained a pretty darn good photograph of the guy.) [read post]
6 May 2019, 12:26 pm
Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:15 pm
The court relied on the awful Commonwealth v. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 11:10 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Richard Winn v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 4:36 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Rudewicz, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Justice [2012] EWCA Civ 499 (24 April 2012) Godfrey, R (on the application of) v Southwark [2012] EWCA Civ 500 (24 April 2012) Westlb AG v Nomura Bank International Plc & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 495 (24 April 2012) Lalli v Spirita Housing Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 497 (24 April 2012) Greenwich Community Law Centre, R (on the application of) v Greenwich… [read post]
Last Week at the 6th Circuit: Substantive unreasonableness, maiden voyages, and railroaded state law
21 May 2019, 11:03 am
in United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 4:50 pm
Superior Ct. 2005) in which Google sued an alleged click fraudster and won a $75k default judgment; and United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 7:19 am
The Second Circuit is not going to let these guys go free.The case is Epps v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 5:06 pm
The result being -- as one might imagine -- an incredible amount of pain to an incredible number of people.Could the dentist defend the resulting lawsuit -- say, when he treated a cavity by slamming a guy's face with a hammer -- by saying "But that's all I could do given the resources with which I was provided by the state?" [read post]
