Search for: "State v. Melendez" Results 361 - 380 of 465
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2007, 12:26 pm
The petition in Melendez-Dias v. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 11:00 am by Michael Lowe
  As we’ve discussed, whether or not police lab experts can be cross-examined by criminal defense counsel was decided this summer in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 11:25 pm
Here are a few of the most important left to be decided, sorted by the date they were argued: Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 12:01 am
At this juncture, here is the Federal Evidence Review's Ten Key Evidence Issues for 2009, which are not necessarily ranked in any order, and are discussed further below: Federal Evidence Review's Ten Key 2009 Key Evidence Issues Attorney General Confirmation Hearings Supreme Court: Pending Melendez-Diaz Confrontation Clause Decision New Rule: FRE 502 (Attorney-Client Privilege And Work-Product Doctrine) The Selective Waiver Doctrine Pending Rule Amendment: FRE 804(b)(3)… [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 5:57 am by Aaron Tang
Today’s discussion returns to Williams v. [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 4:40 pm by Steve Kalar
  Nothing more patriotic for the Fourth of July than a case upholding core constitutional rights (and a remarkable article advocating for greater justice in our system of criminal law and procedure).United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 5:17 am by Russ Bensing
New Mexico, which involves the application of Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:52 pm by Lisa McElroy
  In 2009, in a case called Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 3:47 am by Russ Bensing
  Given the the decision in Michigan v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 2:38 am by Michael DelSignore
Drug offenses in Massachusetts were made more difficult to prove by the United States Supreme Courts' decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 11:01 am by Aaron Tang
In its recent opinion in Bullcoming v. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 7:26 am by The Charge
  That case is pending in the Supreme Judicial Court under the caption Commonwealth v. [read post]