Search for: "State v. Wing"
Results 361 - 380
of 1,678
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2012, 2:27 am
United States. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 4:11 pm
So the high court’s most progressive action likely came in its 5-4 opinion, Miller v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 5:05 pm
In 1986, McBride, as an operative of the African National Congress’s armed wing, detonated a car bomb outside Magoo’s Bar and the Why Not Restaurant in Durban, in which 69 people were injured and three women killed. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 6:05 pm
That Thomas would overrule New York Times v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:17 pm
Our earlier post sets the stage for the case argued today before the SCOTUS; a case straight out of New York City.This recent case, known as New York State Rifle and Pistol Owners v New York City, involves a relatively strict local ordinance banning transportation of personally owned firearms within the city. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:33 am
(The Second Circuit case is Mack v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 8:54 am
Corp. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 10:54 am
In Nordahl v. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 10:54 am
In Nordahl v. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 6:30 am
In American Lung Association v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 9:57 am
(A “United States work” is a work first published in the United States, or simultaneously published in the United States and any foreign country; or an unpublished work (or a work first published in a nation with whom the United States does not have a copyright treaty) for which all authors are citizens of or domiciled in the United States. 17 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 4:18 am
In Nelson v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 5:47 am
In less than a week, the Court will hear oral arguments in Friedrichs v. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 8:00 am
Apple Inc. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 12:50 pm
The reference to Justice Jackson is to the oral argument in Merrill v. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 7:17 pm
Justice Thomas recused himself in Watters v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
And in Lawrence v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 1:37 pm
Do Denim v. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 11:33 am
Lord Mustill in Powell and English stated that where D and P embark on a criminal venture in which P goes further than D wishes, but foreseeably so, D has a measure of culpability for P’s act and V’s resulting death but usually at a lower level than P, D is guilty of murder. [read post]
29 May 2009, 3:40 am
Another is that the other lawyer is David Boies; Boies and Olson squared off as opposing counsel in Bush v. [read post]
