Search for: "Strickland v. State"
Results 361 - 380
of 868
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2012, 6:40 am
Title: Strickland v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 2:50 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2012, 2:15 pm
Although the Court found that counsel performed deficiently under Strickland v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 12:43 pm
State, 2009 WY 17, ¶ 3, 201 P.3d 434, 436 (Wyo. 2009); Harlow v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 2:28 pm
Supreme Court has interpreted as requiring “reasonably effective assistance,” Strickland v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 6:40 pm
” See also United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 9:43 am
The case is State v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 7:09 am
Strickland v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 6:49 pm
United States – immigration removal case where after pleading guilty of a felony the individual was removed, and whether the attorney provided effective assistance of counsel where the attorney did not advise the immigrant of the immigration consequences of the guilty plea (what does “advise” mean; is the court’s decision in Padilla prospective or retrospective; how to make the Strickland standard workable); Evans v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 11:39 am
Berzon argues that the state supreme court applied Strickland in a manner inconsistent with the Supreme Court's decisions regarding developing mitigation. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 6:36 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 7:01 pm
Markus v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 7:31 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 8:19 pm
” Premo v. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 3:05 pm
” Premo v. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 2:35 pm
Strickland, 185 Ga. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 4:48 am
State v. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 1:19 pm
See Jenkins v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 9:57 pm
In the same Term that the Court avoided the constitutional question in NAMUDNO, it used the same avoidance canon to narrowly construe a different provision of the Voting Rights Act in Bartlett v Strickland, and it applied constitutional avoidance (in deed if not in name) to narrowly construe Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act in Ricci v DeStefano, the controversial New Haven firefighters case. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 8:05 am
Hinson, Executive Director United States Consumer Product Safety DivisionWashington, D.C. [read post]
