Search for: "TUCKER v. STATE"
Results 361 - 380
of 661
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2024, 5:24 am
State v. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 8:41 am
See State v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 10:33 am
In SEC v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 9:20 am
See Sullivan v. [read post]
29 May 2007, 8:03 am
The Court agreed to decide whether the federal law that protects railroads from discriminatory state taxes allows the carriers to challenge the state's accounting method for fixing the market value of their property (CSX Transportation v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 6:42 pm
Wilson v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 8:45 am
In Tucker v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 12:15 pm
Fowler, 2007 BCSC 1678, Madam Justice Holmes stated: [34] In Tucker (Public Trustee of) v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:56 am
Co. v Tucker, 273 AD2d 683 [2000]). [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 1:11 am
George Tucker. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 3:13 am
Tucker, 621 A.2d 108, 116 (1993). [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 10:03 am
Tucker, 82 So.3d 126 (FL 4th DCA 2002). [read post]
31 Jul 2010, 7:13 am
A new California Court of Appeal case, Tucker v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 1:31 pm
Tucker, 82 So.3d 126 (FL 4th DCA 2002). [read post]
22 May 2017, 9:21 am
Tucker, 82 So.3d 126 (FL 4th DCA 2002). [read post]
18 May 2015, 2:18 pm
Or as another court decision, Williamson v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 6:50 am
Supreme Court SEC v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 8:38 am
United States, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes created a meme. [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 4:10 am
Now, in Eknes-Tucker v. [read post]
