Search for: "Tea v. State"
Results 361 - 380
of 981
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2008, 12:13 am
Special requirements for employees engaged on Federal or State contracts and grants The Federal Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 (Public Law 100-690, Title V, Subtitle D) and the State Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1990 require that University employees directly engaged in the performance of work on a Federal or State contract or grant shall abide by this Policy as a condition of employment. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 4:40 am
Herbaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 4:49 am
In Bundrick v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 10:37 am
This decision does indeed, as Justice Kavanaugh stated, satisfy common sense. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 10:42 pm
This year, the keynote speech will be delivered by Allan James, Senior Hearing Officer at the UKIPO.Starting at 2 pm and finishing with drinks and canapes from 6:15pm at Simmons’ offices in Citypoint, Moorgate, the full line up is below:14:00-14:30 – Registration14:30-14:40 – Introduction and welcome (Darren Meale)14:40-15:40 – Panel 1 – “When you do nothing or you can’t do anything – acquiescence and other modern challenges in trade mark… [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 5:19 am
Justice Kennedy in Vieth v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 4:45 am
These were the question the Supreme Court considered in Mach Mining, LLC v. [read post]
5 Jul 2014, 10:21 am
David Simpson, a small-l libertarian Republican Texas state rep from Longview, authored an Independence Day column in his local paper opining that the US Supreme Court's recent ruling in Riley v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 11:15 am
We’ve blogged about United States v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 3:24 pm
The First Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 12:00 pm
Bus. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 10:12 am
[The Atlantic] Judge Permits Virginia Health Care Law Challenge to Continue [Fox News] Commonwealth of Virginia v. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 7:01 am
The Supreme Court decided Texas v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:15 am
Most recently in 2010, in United States v. [read post]
30 May 2019, 8:11 am
And court watchers will continue to read these particular tea leaves for months to come. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:34 am
Hmm, what shall I have for tea? [read post]
2 Feb 2025, 11:35 pm
The Court found that the term ‘coffee’ has a serious risk of deception, when used in connection with goods and services including or related to tea, cocoa, and artificial coffee. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 8:11 am
See Creazzo v. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 4:36 am
The case of Luis v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 1:00 pm
Pa. 2012); Horsmon v. [read post]
