Search for: "United States v. Grand Jury Investigation"
Results 361 - 380
of 825
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2024, 12:58 pm
In that case, the United States Supreme Court held that "insofar as [a] Florida law prohibit[ed] a grand jury witness from disclosing his own testimony after the term of the grand jury [had] ended, it violate[d] the First Amendment. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 5:47 am
According to the Sixth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2024, 10:53 am
The only decision Combs identifies that appears to involve a bar on speech by all potential witnesses is United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 4:49 am
Here, the United States informs the defendant that he's the "target" of a federal grand jury investigation and that they're definitely going to indict him, but also lets him know they're potentially willing to make a deal -- and invites him to come on in and negotiate.The defendant doesn't have his own lawyer, and also can't afford one. [read post]
23 Oct 2022, 6:43 am
Grand juries—and, for that matter, civil litigants—routinely employ subpoenas for phone records, and any such subpoena necessarily reveals something about a person’s associations. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 8:10 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 11:12 am
In his grand jury testimony, Sergeant Thomas Finan, supervisor of the Atlantic County Prosecutor's Office Computer Crimes Investigation Unit, stated that [Parsons] acknowledged that the photographs were for the parties' use only and were not to be distributed to third parties. [read post]
22 Dec 2018, 7:01 pm
The case involves a dispute between an unidentified U.S. prosecutor and an unidentified business firm that is controlled by a foreign government, with the dispute centering on a subpoena to compel the company to supply information for use by a federal grand jury that is investigating potential crimes “against the laws of the United States. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 10:02 am
Within this due process safeguard (made applicable to the states by the Fourteen Amendment), the “right to remain silent” was born in 1966 in Miranda v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 10:30 am
United States. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 1:02 pm
United States, or the Supreme Court’s Liparota v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 3:32 am
In the United States v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 3:13 pm
A Grand Jury indicted him on December 21, 2015, for one count of Possession of a Firearm By a Person Prohibited ..., and one count of Possession of Ammunition By a Person Prohibited .... [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 9:26 am
The Court held that a successful prosecution under this provision requires proof that the defendant contemplated a particular, foreseeable proceeding that constitutes an "official proceeding," that is, "a proceeding before a judge or court of the United States, a United States magistrate judge, a bankruptcy judge, a judge of the United States Tax Court, a special trial judge of the Tax Court, a judge of the United… [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 6:41 am
Fleming responded that it is easy to assess whether an investigation or proceeding is pending, providing as examples a police case being opened or a grand jury proceeding commencing. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 12:59 pm
United States. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 6:03 am
Thein The Supreme Court of the United States held in Dobbs v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 10:49 am
On August 4, 2011, a federal grand jury in Miami indicted Lombera with one count of conspiracy to commit health care fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1349, six counts of health care fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1347, and six counts of aggravated identity theft, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1028A, Case No. 11-20528-Cr-Seitz. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 10:49 am
On August 4, 2011, a federal grand jury in Miami indicted Lombera with one count of conspiracy to commit health care fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1349, six counts of health care fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1347, and six counts of aggravated identity theft, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1028A, Case No. 11-20528-Cr-Seitz. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 2:36 pm
United States has lots of new directions in it. [read post]
