Search for: "United States v. Grand Jury Investigation"
Results 361 - 380
of 827
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2012, 7:17 am
The style of the case is Sanders v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 10:48 am
United States impose upon all federal prosecutors an obligation to disclose exculpatory and impeachment information. [read post]
14 Aug 2024, 12:58 pm
In that case, the United States Supreme Court held that "insofar as [a] Florida law prohibit[ed] a grand jury witness from disclosing his own testimony after the term of the grand jury [had] ended, it violate[d] the First Amendment. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 5:47 am
According to the Sixth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2024, 10:53 am
The only decision Combs identifies that appears to involve a bar on speech by all potential witnesses is United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 4:49 am
Here, the United States informs the defendant that he's the "target" of a federal grand jury investigation and that they're definitely going to indict him, but also lets him know they're potentially willing to make a deal -- and invites him to come on in and negotiate.The defendant doesn't have his own lawyer, and also can't afford one. [read post]
23 Oct 2022, 6:43 am
Grand juries—and, for that matter, civil litigants—routinely employ subpoenas for phone records, and any such subpoena necessarily reveals something about a person’s associations. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 8:10 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 11:12 am
In his grand jury testimony, Sergeant Thomas Finan, supervisor of the Atlantic County Prosecutor's Office Computer Crimes Investigation Unit, stated that [Parsons] acknowledged that the photographs were for the parties' use only and were not to be distributed to third parties. [read post]
22 Dec 2018, 7:01 pm
The case involves a dispute between an unidentified U.S. prosecutor and an unidentified business firm that is controlled by a foreign government, with the dispute centering on a subpoena to compel the company to supply information for use by a federal grand jury that is investigating potential crimes “against the laws of the United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 10:30 am
United States. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 10:02 am
Within this due process safeguard (made applicable to the states by the Fourteen Amendment), the “right to remain silent” was born in 1966 in Miranda v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 3:32 am
In the United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 1:02 pm
United States, or the Supreme Court’s Liparota v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 3:13 pm
A Grand Jury indicted him on December 21, 2015, for one count of Possession of a Firearm By a Person Prohibited ..., and one count of Possession of Ammunition By a Person Prohibited .... [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 9:26 am
The Court held that a successful prosecution under this provision requires proof that the defendant contemplated a particular, foreseeable proceeding that constitutes an "official proceeding," that is, "a proceeding before a judge or court of the United States, a United States magistrate judge, a bankruptcy judge, a judge of the United States Tax Court, a special trial judge of the Tax Court, a judge of the United… [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 6:41 am
Fleming responded that it is easy to assess whether an investigation or proceeding is pending, providing as examples a police case being opened or a grand jury proceeding commencing. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 12:59 pm
United States. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 6:03 am
Thein The Supreme Court of the United States held in Dobbs v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 2:36 pm
United States has lots of new directions in it. [read post]
