Search for: "United States v. McConnell"
Results 361 - 380
of 441
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
The justices faced heightened security risks, Thomas noted, after the leak of the court’s majority opinion to overturn Roe v. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 9:30 pm
Two Cheers for Recess Appointments Peter Shane (Ohio State University) | June 26 As losses go, NLRB v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 6:02 am
This process is not bound by the strictures of the United States Code. [read post]
28 Apr 2018, 12:23 pm
Of course, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has promised not to let the Judiciary Committee legislation come to a vote. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 7:18 pm
Goldfarb, 430 U.S. 199 (1977)—both cases she argued—provided the basis for her opinion for the Court in United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 7:31 am
"The idea of people proudly chanting anti-Semitic slogans in the streets is chilling enough; it is even more chilling that these protesters were grateful to the President of the United States for changing the political climate in their favor.On Friday August 25, as Hurricane Harvey battered Texas's Gulf Coast, and while public attention was diverted, Trump issued a formal executive order calling for the removal of transgender service personnel from the Armed Forces. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
This controversial tool, which the Constitution says absolutely nothing about, is an example of an institutional rule that, for better or worse, has impacted constitutional development within the United States. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 9:01 pm
United States—”anticanonical,” but not infamous.Perhaps he avoided the language of infamy because his analysis was empirical, rather than normative. [read post]
3 May 2017, 9:01 pm
”Although House Republicans voted to replace Paul Ryan as Speaker of the House, the new leadership immediately jumped on McConnell’s bandwagon. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 2:37 pm
Roberts v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
United States, 139 S. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 12:42 am
Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990), is a United States Supreme Court case that determined that the state could deny unemployment benefits to a person fired for violating a state prohibition on the use of peyote, even though the use of the drug was part of a religious ritual. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 8:55 am
Michigan Chamber of Commerce (1990) and McConnell v. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 11:11 am
Michigan Chamber of Commerce and portions of McConnell v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 1:35 pm
Question: In what basic way does your book differ from that of Jan Crawford’s Supreme Conflict: The Inside Story of the Struggle for Control of the United States Supreme Court (2008) and Jeffrey Toobin’s The Nine: Inside the Secret World of the Supreme Court (2008)? [read post]
9 May 2015, 6:25 am
On Tuesday, Wells linked to an en banc decision by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 3:02 pm
The Republicans could demand, say, a constitutional amendment overruling Roe v. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 3:12 pm
But in United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 2:07 pm
" McConnell v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:19 am
United States and Printz. [read post]
