Search for: "United States v. Mississippi" Results 361 - 380 of 1,507
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2023, 11:22 am by Kaufman Dolowich Voluck
On July 12, 2023, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, which has jurisdiction over Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi, made it easier for employees to prove overtime violations in situations where their employer lacks timekeeping records or where those records are inaccurate or incomplete. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 3:04 am by Amy Howe
United States applies retroactively, noting that the Court “may well be on the verge of doing something it hasn’t done in decades (and of settling a messy, messy circuit split in the process). [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 9:14 am by Steven Boutwell
The United States Coast Guard named Settoon the strictly liable Responsible Party under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (“OPA 90”) (codified at 33 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 6:45 pm by Ed Gehres
Bay Mills Indian Community was significantly more supportive of the historical view of tribal sovereignty urged by the tribe and the United States in this case. [read post]
Which state’s wage and hour laws apply to Louisiana employers whose employees applied and interviewed for their jobs in Louisiana, acknowledged receipt of employment documents in Louisiana, and resided in Texas, Mississippi, and Ohio while they worked offshore? [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 1:18 pm by Sheppard Mullin
F.T.C., 440 U.S. 69, 80 (1979); United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 10:59 am
California, 547 U.S. 843, 850 (2006), the United States Supreme Court held that: [P]arolees are on the "continuum" of state-imposed punishments. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 3:54 am by Mark Graber
Mississippi had to be ousted from authority for northerners to insist on Brown v. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 1:33 pm
Mississippi, 410 U.S. 284 (1973)" Parle, __ F.3d at __ (also citing Montana v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 12:45 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Petitioner’s counsel demonstrated the necessity of the long distance telephone calls, having included line items indicating the necessity of calling the United States State Department, an attorney in Mexico, the Mexican consulate, and Petitioner concerning the return of DFB to Mexico. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:07 am by Joel R. Brandes
Petitioner’s counsel demonstrated the necessity of the long distance telephone calls, having included line items indicating the necessity of calling the United States State Department, an attorney in Mexico, the Mexican consulate, and Petitioner concerning the return of DFB to Mexico. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 10:16 pm
The United States Supreme Court has recently stepped up the pace. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 6:23 pm
Supreme Court handed down its opinion in United States v. [read post]