Search for: "United States v. One Case of Clocks" Results 361 - 380 of 541
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2020, 5:00 am by Margaret Taylor
The Appointments Clause of the Constitution requires high-level officers of the United States to be appointed through nomination by the president, with the advice and consent of the Senate. [read post]
22 May 2013, 6:00 am by Robert Chesney
The justices had one such example before them at that very moment: the case of Jose Padilla. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am by Marty Lederman
  Moreover, with respect to that one of the two options a RFRA claim is virtually foreclosed by the Court’s unanimous 1982 decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 2:48 pm by Daniel M. Kowalski
§ 2401(a) of the United States Code generally requires that the complaint to commence such an action must be “filed within six-years after the right of action accrues. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 12:25 pm by Wolfgang Demino
 JOAN BAYEv.MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL.Civil Action No. 17-4789.United States District Court, E.D. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 12:25 pm by Wolfgang Demino
 JOAN BAYEv.MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL.Civil Action No. 17-4789.United States District Court, E.D. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
” At National Review, Michael Brendan Dougherty explains why he has “started to think that Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy may be the one man preventing the United States from political breakdown. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 7:56 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
One might want to look at the case, because the DoJ briefmisstates what the issue was in Seaborg. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 4:12 am
The Stanford Law Review has an interesting series of articles on privacy in its most recent edition: A Reasonableness Approach to Searches After the Jones GPS Tracking Case by Peter Swire In the oral argument this fall in United States v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 10:52 pm
SCOTUSBLog is the go-to source on that topic and also on SCOTUS' decision yesterday to overturn Michigan v. [read post]